"Nectar in a sieve" represents the pointlessness of having work without hope. After all, if you put nectar in a sieve, it all just goes through. So, the first line is saying that work needs a motivation, which would be hope. Otherwise no one would work.
The second line on the other hand is about how hope can only survive if it has something to return. For example, you can't hope endlessly if there is no substance and work to back it up. This line I got in a debate with my friend about. That was my interpretation. My friend said that it means hope needs a person (which is the object) to be hoping. Otherwise hope wouldn't exist.
All in all, the lines mean that work needs hope and hope needs work. At least, that's what I think =]
A sieve or a colander cannot contain water because of the holes that allow liquid to pass through.
No, a cork cannot pass through a sieve. The cork's size is typically larger than the openings in a sieve, preventing it from passing through.
The relationship between micron and sieve sizes is not linear, as they measure particles in different ways. However, generally, smaller micron sizes correspond to larger sieve sizes. For example, a micron size of 75 is roughly equivalent to a sieve size of 200. It's best to refer to a conversion chart for more accurate conversions.
One way to separate stones from grains is by using a sieve or a mesh screen. Pour the mixture of stones and grains over the sieve and shake it gently. The grains will pass through the small holes while the stones remain on top of the sieve.
Sieving is the process of separating particles based on their size using a sieve or mesh. The material to be sieved is poured onto the sieve, and then the sieve is agitated or tapped gently to allow smaller particles to pass through while larger particles are retained on top. This method is commonly used in industries such as food processing, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals for particle size analysis and separation.
"Work without hope draws nectar in a sieve, And hope without an object cannot live." right before the introduction.
"Nectar in a Sieve" was written by Kamala Markandaya and first published in 1954.
Nectar in a Sieve has 190 pages.
"Nectar in a sieve" represents the pointlessness of having work without hope. After all, if you put nectar in a sieve, it all just goes through. So, the first line is saying that work needs a motivation, which would be hope. Otherwise no one would work. The second line on the other hand is about how hope can only survive if it has something to return. For example, you can't hope endlessly if there is no substance and work to back it up. This line I got in a debate with my friend about. That was my interpretation. My friend said that it means hope needs a person (which is the object) to be hoping. Otherwise hope wouldn't exist. All in all, the lines mean that work needs hope and hope needs work. At least, that's what I think =]
No one
Sure! A possible thesis for "Nectar in a Sieve" could be: "The novel 'Nectar in a Sieve' explores the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity, highlighting the importance of perseverance and hope amidst challenges such as poverty, modernization, and loss."
The title "Nectar in a Sieve" symbolizes the idea of trying to grasp something precious and fleeting, only to have it slip through your fingers. The nectar represents sustenance, beauty, and sweetness, while the sieve represents the inevitable loss or inability to fully retain these qualities.
Perhaps, if the regal government constitutes the ability to sieve nectar, provided it is in a powdered state thus allowing it to be sieved, if that is the case then perhaps the dictionary of law will allow the ability to sieve the substance in question, which it does in Page 397, Paragraph 2 Of The regal Constitution Of nectar Sieving.
He grows rice.
she didnt!! :D
Arjun, Thambi, Murugan, Raja, Selvam, and Kuti.
Rural India, during a time when there was a lot of urban development in the land.