Typically the jurisdiction (state, country, whatever) has the authority to prosecute - IF - they have any statues on their books that make the scam illegal. It is surprising how many nations have not enacted such laws. Some have chosen not to because the illegal activities provide revenue for them. Sometimes you will even find government officials involved in the illegal activities - mostly via bribes and such.
If the US has an extradition treaty with the nation where the perpetrator resides, they file charges and seek to extradite the perpetrator to the USA for prosecution.
"Nolle prosequi" is a Latin legal term meaning "to be unwilling to pursue." When a prosecutor decides to nolle prosequi a case, they are indicating that they no longer wish to pursue the charges against the defendant. This may happen for various reasons, such as lack of evidence or a change in circumstances.
The word you're looking for is "prosecute." It means to officially charge someone with a crime and bring them to court to answer for their actions.
Traditional authority is based on longstanding custom and beliefs, with power passed down through generations. Rational-legal authority, on the other hand, is based on established laws and rules, with power derived from one's position in a hierarchical structure. Traditional authority is often seen in traditional societies, while rational-legal authority is characteristic of modern bureaucratic systems.
Traditional authority,legal authority,and autocratic authority.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
They have no legal athority to force anyone to press charges.
Prosecute
Yes. An executor has no legal authority until they have been appointed by the court.Yes. An executor has no legal authority until they have been appointed by the court.Yes. An executor has no legal authority until they have been appointed by the court.Yes. An executor has no legal authority until they have been appointed by the court.
There is no such power known as "legal rubber stamp" authority.
An alleged perpetrator is only under suspicion until proven that they are a perpetrator. The word 'alleged' is a legal term used when they have no evidence to prove the individual they suspect is otherwise proven by the law there is evidence they are a perpetrator. Example: If someone called you a liar and gossiped enough to tarnish your reputation then you could try and sue them, but, if they say that you are an alleged liar there is no clear cut evidence you are.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
This is not legal advice, but maybe first you'd better find out the facts. Take notes and have a witness.