answersLogoWhite

0

The state/ District Attorney

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the burden of proof in Virginia to prove sexual misconduct with a minor?

The "burden" is in proving that the sexual contact did take place and that the victim was a 'minor' at the time of the offense. The same 'burden' of proof as with any other sex offense, or criminal case.


What is the burden of proof for adultery under the UCMJ?

In a criminal trial (e.g. a Court-Martial) the burden of proof is the same as in state and federal criminal law. The burden is the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed each of the elements of the charged offense.


Who must meet the burden of proof in criminal cases?

Prosecutor


In a criminal case the burden of proof is always placed on who?

(in the US) The burden is placed on the prosecution.


What would happen if we decided to use the civil law burden of proof as the burden of proof in our criminal trial?

There would probably be more convictions.


What is a burden of proof in a trial?

The so-called "burden of proof" is the burden that the prosecutor (in a criminal trial) or the plaintiff's attorney (in a civil trial) must present to a judge and/or jury in order to convince them that the event DID occur, and that the defendant (criminal) or respondant (civil) is the one that did it.


At a criminal trial the burden of proof is on an accused person to prove his or her innocence.?

Actually the answer is false. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. "Innocent until proven guilty".


In a criminal case, what standard must the burden of proof meet to establish the guilt of the defendant?

In a criminal case, the burden of proof must meet the standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt" to establish the guilt of the defendant.


Who has the burden of proof?

"Beyond a reasonable doubt" in a criminal case, "A preponderance of the evidence" in a civil case. The advocate of a case always has the burden of proof - the prosecutor in a criminal case, the plaintiff in a civil case.


How does the burden of proof differ in civil versus criminal cases?

In civil cases, the burden of proof is typically on the plaintiff, who must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that their claims are true. In criminal cases, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, who must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a higher standard of proof than in civil cases.


Who bears onus of proof in criminal and civil cases?

In both cases, the moving party bears the burden of proof. In a criminal case, that is the government. In a civil case, that is the plaintiff.


What is the difference between burden of proof and standard of proof?

Burden of proof is who has to prove the case by meeting or exceeding the standard of proof. In a criminal case, it's the prosecution. In a civil case, it's the plaintiff. Standard of proof is the unquantifiable amount of proof that must be shown. In criminal cases, it's beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases, it's a preponderance of the evidence.