This could be debated for eternity without an answer that would satisfy everyone. I am going to say neither. They are equal. They balance each other out, at least, in the case of a domocracy like the USA. The leaders make the decisions, and the people generaly control the flow. If leaders do something the people don't like, as we've seen in the past, they have the power to protest and persuade change. In a general standpoint of civilization, they are equal in all Normal cases of government. Again, there's no answer, this is just my opinion.
This does seem to be true...
Through military power
"Theocracy" means that power is held by religious leaders.
bill of rights
The most real power in the Senate is in the hands of the majority and minority leaders.
He warned against Phillip II power because Phillip had recently taken over near by Thessaly. He saw through what most athenians thought of as an unimportant war.
Most dictators abuse power, such as:HitlerMussiliniStalinSaddam HusseinNorth Korean leaders - son just inherited leadershipCastro
it gave the people the power to make laws and elect leaders.
There are three leadership paradigms: autocratic, paternalistic, and servant. Autocratic leaders are the most authoritarian of the three, paternalistic leaders act like a parent-figure among their subordinates, and servant leaders share the most power with others and focus on helping others in the group improve and perform well.
the poor became powerful and rich became richer. eventually most people supported leaders in the army.
Most of the build a bear citzens hang out at the furbulous fashion district. They do this in U.S. and Canada mostly. Not so much in a Asia
Japan government is a constitutional monarchy. The emperor has no power. The Prime Minister has most power. The congress is called the Diet. The leaders of the Diet elect the Prime Minister.(i think)