the person who held supreme power in a crisis is Augutus he was the (revered one)
the person who held supreme power in a crisis is Augutus he was the (revered one)
The word you are looking for is "dictator." In early Rome, a dictator was appointed during emergencies and held supreme authority for a limited time, typically until the crisis was resolved. This role allowed for swift decision-making and action during critical situations.
It depends on the "emperor" you are talking about. The emperor of Byzantium, or the Greek Eastern Empire, ruled a sophisticated state with many of the same powers and privileges as the ancient Roman emperors. The German emperors of the Latin West aspired to similar prestige, but ruled over a far more fractious polity and had to compete with powerful feudal barons for control of their realm.
In ancient Rome, the power of the state was primarily held by the Senate, particularly during the Republic era, where it acted as a governing body composed of Rome's elite. However, during the transition to the Empire, power shifted to the emperors, who held supreme authority and controlled the military, administration, and legislation. Notable emperors like Augustus established the framework for imperial rule, effectively centralizing power in the hands of one individual while maintaining the facade of republican governance.
Both Because...Good.He was a great leader because he made Rome better, conquered lots of places for Rome, he had great controlling power, he was intelligent, and ambitions.Bad.He invested with supreme authority during a crisis. So he set himself as a dictator.
The Roman emperors were absolute rulers. They power was absolute.
Marc Antony was the one who challenged Octavian for supreme power.
Ancient Rome is not the supreme example for politics.
Ancient Rome did not have a Supreme Court in the modern sense. However, it had a complex legal system with various courts and magistrates overseeing different types of cases. The highest judicial authority was the Senate, which could influence legal decisions, and the Emperor often held ultimate judicial power. Legal decisions were also guided by the Twelve Tables and later legal codes, but there was no singular court akin to a Supreme Court as we understand it today.
hope this helps: The roman emperor lead the country and took contol in making the difficult decisions. they helped keep the the country in order. They made laws and kept the country at peace.
If the executive power was held by three people, a crisis would be a very hectic time. There would be a lot of disagreement over what to do. Ultimately one person holding the executive power would be most efficient because he or she would just direct people on what to do as opposed to people arguing or debating over whats best. In a certain sense, a three part executive might develop much as ancient Rome did when three generals were appointed to rule the empire.
No, the 2012 Olympics were not held in Rome.