The supreme court
there is only 25 bill of rights Actually dude, I believe there are only 10.
legislativeAnother View: WRONG! It is the Judicial Branchwhich interprets the Bill of Rights, an integral part of the US Constitution.
The United Kingdom is actually governed by two documents, The Bill of Rights (English Bill of Righst, not to be confused with the U.S. Bill of Rights) and Magna Carta.
Yes, legally. Other countries may decide to model THEIR constitutions, perhaps rendering "a bill of rights" unnecessary. You see, the "Bill of Rights" are actually "Amendments to the Constitution".
The Bill of Rights was actually made after the US Constitution. The English Bill of Rights influenced it in some way, though I do not know how. I'm actually trying to figure that out right now myself.
Actually, the original draft of the Constitution had no Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a collection of ten amendments, or "changes." These changes were made in order to clarify the position of the document concerning certain issues.
Washington. The Congress wouldn't ratify it until the Bill of Rights was added. Then, Washington was elected President. So actually there was no President when they were added.
The substantive constraints found in the Bill of Rights outline how much power the government actually has. One of these constraints is found in the rules for search and seizure.
Bill or rights guarantees.
The substantive constraints found in the Bill of Rights outline how much power the government actually has. One of these constraints is found in the rules for search and seizure.
The United States Bill of Rights was actually somewhat of a compromise, meant to ease the concerns of the anti-federalists who thought the US Constitution, without a Bill of Rights, did not sufficiently protect individual rights. It was ratified on December 15, 1791.
The English Bill of Rights