0
George de Maestrel George de Maestrel George de Maestrel
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In real estate what does 'for sale by deadline treaty' mean?
The property is listed as a sole agency for a minimum period of ninety days. A sale date is established (deadline date), on which date the vendor will consider all offers. Offers are invited to be submitted prior to the deadline and may be accepted by the vendor. If no offers are acceptable on the sale date, negotiations will commence with a selected buyer.
How has the American economy changed over the past 200 years?
due to the globalization the world is collected to a single city that comes with the improvement of transpotation technology and communication technologys. the change that come at a past due to the technological improvements are looking the grate roll.
What do Muslims think about Poverty and Wealth?
This question is 'directionless'. What a common man would think about poverty and wealth from the point of his concern is what a Muslim thinks about the same. The only difference lies is in the context of the message of the Qur'an which states that "indeed Allaah is the giver of the wealth and the things which you don't know". Hence when a Muslim is impoverished, he makes an attempt to earn his livelihood through the means which have been deemed lawful in the Shari'at and prays to Allaah to bear fruits to his attempts. A wealthy person, as per the Shari'at, gives away the Zakaat to his Ulil Amr who is Da'i ul-Mutlaq (aq) of his time, he gives Sadaqaah (charity) to the needy. There are 5 pillars in Islam. One of them is "zakkat" this means that you have to donate money to the needy every year. 5% of your savings has to go to the needy. Muslims have peace, they are not greedy for wealth.
What are the factors which led to trade unionism in Africa?
A trade union (British English), labour union (Canadian English) or labor union (American English) is an organization of workers who have banded together to achieve common goals such as protecting the integrity of its trade, achieving higher pay, increasing the number of employees an employer hires, and better working conditions. The trade union, through its leadership, bargains with the employer on behalf of union members (rank and file members) and negotiates labour contracts (collective bargaining) with employers. The most common purpose of these associations or unions is "maintaining or improving the conditions of theiremployment".[1]This may include the negotiation of wages, work rules, complaint procedures, rules governing hiring, firing and promotion of workers, benefits, workplace safety and policies. The agreements negotiated by the union leaders are binding on the rank and file members and the employer and in some cases on other non-member workers.Originating in Europe, trade unions became popular in many countries during the Industrial Revolution, when the lack of skill necessary to perform most jobs shifted employment bargaining power almost completely to the employers' side, causing many workers to be mistreated and underpaid. Trade union organisations may be composed of individualworkers, professionals, past workers, students, apprenticesand/or the unemployed.Over the last three hundred years, trade unions have developed into a number of forms. Aside from collective bargaining, activities vary, but may include:Provision of benefits to members: Early trade unions, like Friendly Societies, often provided a range of benefits toinsuremembers against unemployment, ill health, old age and funeral expenses. In many developed countries, these functions have been assumed by the state; however, the provision of professional training, legal advice and representation for members is still an important benefit of trade union membership.Industrial action: Trade unions may enforce strikesor resistance to lockouts in furtherance of particular goals.Political activity: Trade unions may promote legislation favourable to the interests of their members or workers as a whole. To this end they may pursue campaigns, undertake lobbying, or financially support individual candidates or parties (such as the Labour Partyin Britain) for public office. In some countries (e.g., the Nordic countries and thePhilippines), trade unions may be invited to participate in government hearings about educational or other labour market reforms.
Article on Growth model by Mrs Joan Robinson?
J. Robinson describes the 'golden age' as one where there is full employment of labour and full utilization of capital. In her own words, "when technical progress is neutral, and proceeding steadily, without any change in the time pattern of production, the competitive mechanism working freely, population growing (if at all) at a steady rate and accumulation going on fast enough to supply productive capacity for all available labour, the rate of profit tends to be constant and the level of real wages to rise with output per man. Then there are no internal contradictions in the system... Total annual output and the stock of capital (valued in terms of commodities) then grow together at a constant proportionate rate compounded of the rate of increase of the labour force and the rate of increase of output per man. We may describe these conditions as a golden age (thus indicating that it represents a mythical state of affairs not likely to obtain in any actual economy)." In the language of Roy Harrod we can say that golden age corresponds to a situation where the natural, the warranted and the actual rate of growth of national income are all equal. It represents a state of economic bliss, since consumption is then increasing at the maximum technically feasible rate which is compatible with maintaining that rate of increase. Assuming K/N = 0 = constant in conditions of full employment and fill utilization, an increase in the amount of fully employed labour is given by AN = AK/0. The rate of growth of fully employed labour is then given by which shows that fully employed labour grows at the same rate as the rate of growth of capital, aifei which implies that capital must grow as fast as labour population, the condition of course being that the capital- labour ratio (0) is constant. Let us now consider the question whether the economy possesses any equilibrating mechanism if and when it diverges from the 'golden age' equilibrium for some reason. There are two possibilities indicating divergence. Let us consider (i) first. The implies that labour population is growing faster than capital accumulation leading to a situation of progressive underemployment. Naturally this state is found in most of the underdeveloped countries. Given the state of technology, a higher rate of population growth as compared to capital accumulation leads to a reduction in the money-wage rate (w) of the workers. If the general price level (p) remains constant, the real wage rate (w/p) will also decline. If this happens, the rate of growth of capital can increase since the profit rate would tend to increase as indicated by equation. In such circumstances, the rate of growth of capital would increase to catch up with the constant rate of growth of labour population so as to make AK/K = AN/N. If, however, real wages fail to fall either because money wages are rigid or because the price level falls in the same proportion as money wages, the equilibrating mechanism cannot operate and 'progressive underemployment' cannot disappear. This corresponds with Harrod's notion of indefinite instability "based on the assumptions of the constancy of technological coefficients and relative factor-price movements." 15 Let us take up (ii) now. In this situation capital accumulation grows faster than labour population. Naturally this situation corresponds to the conditions of the developed countries. The possibility of returning to the path of golden age' equilibrium is greater here because even if the real-wage rate were rigid, a change in labour productivity (p) or in the capital-labour ratio (0) might well be such as to increase the profit rate and hence the rate of growth of capital, as would be clear from equation (2.11). According to Kurihara, "This is where J. Robinson goes beyond her basic model and becomes more Schumpeterian than Ricardian."16 If we concentrate our attention on the production function given by (2.5), we can see that it would shift upward if labour productivity (Y/N = p) increased for the same capital-labour-ratio (K/N = 9) or if the latter ratio decreased for the same value of the former. Let us now turn our attention to equation (2.11). This suggests that if labour productivity (p) rises faster than the real wage rate (w/p) while 0 remains constant, then the rate of growth of capital can increase. Even if there is no change in w/p and p and only the capital- labour ratio (0) falls, the rate of growth of capital can again increase. The problem arises only when a fall in capital-labor ratio (0) is accompanied by a more than proportionate decrease in labour productivity (p) for a given real-wage rate (w/p) because, in this instance, the rate of growth of capital will decline instead of increasing. The thrust of Robinson's, Galbraith's and Shapiro's argument is that anything that reduces the impact of uncertainty on the decisions on the production, employment and, most importantly, accumulation of firms, is likely to result in more satisfactory and stable systemic behaviour. Especially is it likely to beget a higher rate of accumulation on average and so a greater chance of absorbing the level of saving associated, if not with full employment levels of income, at least with high levels, certainly higher levels than would occur in a system characterised by the Marshalling freely competitive structures that Keynes used for most of the time in his models in The General Theory itself. In one of her first works Economics is a Serious Subject: The Apologia of an Economist to the Mathematician, the Scientist and the Plain Mans, Robinson analysed the historical development of economical thought. She saw economics as (1) an attempt to produce objective scientific knowledge of a business world, and (2) a branch of theology a means of the ruling ideology and an instrument of social control. She believed that economists need to separate those two aspects. Joan Robinson was initially a supporter of neoclassical economics; her first major work The Economics of Imperfect Competition being largely within mainstream economics. There, she analysed the theory of imperfect competition, trying to replace existing economic models based on perfect competition with ones based in imperfect competition. However, since most economists" analysed economic equilibria assuming perfect competition, Robinson's models did not receive much attention at the time. Her work however, together with Edward H. Chamberlin's Theory of Monopolistic Competition started wide discussion on monopolistic competition. In her article on the neoclassical theory of distribution, Euler's Theorem and the Problem of Distribution, Robinson further contributed to Marshallian economics. Robinson abandoned her views on neoclassical economics after getting acquainted with John Maynard Keynes. As a member of the "Cambridge School" of economics, Robinson assisted with the support and exposition of Keynes' General Theory, writing especially on its employment implications in 1936 and 1937 (in the midst of the Great Depression it tried to explain). She eventually became one of the leading interpreters of Keynes, defending his ideas against the criticism of mainstream conservative economists. She also argued for expanding of Keynes' General Theory to other fields of economics. In 1942 Robinson's An Essay on Marxian Economics famously concentrated on Karl Marx as an economist, helping revive the debate on this aspect of his legacy. The book brought Marx's political and economic ideas back into the spotlight of contemporary debate. In 1949, she was invited by Ragnar Frisch to become the vice-president of the Econometric Society but declined. In the 1950s, Piero Sraffa and Robinson started what has been known as the "Cambridge Capital Controversy," concerning the nature and role of capital goods. In her 1954 article "The Production Function and the Theory of Capital," Robinson attacked the traditional neoclassical view that capital could be measured and aggregated. Sraffa's and Robinson's views became the Cambridge position. On the other side were Americans, including Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who claimed that capital could be aggregated.
What is Welcrow?
Welcrow is a 2 component fixation device. Mostly welcrow is used in form of straps. One strap is covered with a fluffy material, the counterpart is covered with micro barbed hooks. This combination is perfect for a quick and waterproof fixation that can be unfastened and re-used more or less unlimitedly.
What is the present perfect tense of invite?
The present perfect tense of invited is has invited or have invited.
What is the present perfect tense to the verb invite?
The present perfect of the verb to invite is "has invited" and "have invited".Examples:I have invited my sisters.You have invited my sisters.He (she) has invited my sisters.We have invited my sisters.They have invited my sisters.
Present perfect tense of invited?
Have/has invited.
When do you use invited in a sentence?
we use invited when you have aldready been invited
What is the correct grammar for you and your family is invited or you and your family are invited?
You and your family are invited.
Which is correct form of invitation you are invited to lunch or you are invited at lunch?
The correct form of invitation in "you are invited to lunch" or "you are invited at lunch" is "you are invited to lunch". You could also say, "you are invited to lunch at my house" as this would be grammatically correct.
Which is right invited to or invited for?
Depends on the situation. Invited TO means you're invited to a place, like a party or a friend's house. Eg. You have been invited to a party down the road. <:D Invited FOR means you're invited for something like tea or coffee, mainly things not to do with caffeine :P Eg. You have been invited for tea by a friend.
When was You Are Invited created?
You Are Invited was created in 1999.
An invitation to or an invitation for which is correct?
It is correct to say that you are invited to a particular event, not invited for.
When do you use invited and invitation?
Invited is the action, the invitation is what you get. If you receive an invitation, then you have been invited to a party.
What is the active voice of -The president invited them?
"The president invited them" is active voice.The passive equivalent is "They were invited by the president."
