If a parked car is hit my a moving car, the moving car is obviously at fault. If a moving car is hit by a car backing out of a space, the second car is at fault for failure to yeild, as the first car had right of way. If two cars are backing out and hit each other, it may be hard to determine who's at fault, as both driver's vision may have been compromised.
Rule of thumb: if two cars are in an accident and only one of them is moving, it's the fault of the car that was moving.
Generally, the person backing out is at fault. If you are both backing out you're probably both at fault and will probably share the cost of repair, with each repairing their own. yes because you were backing out and they hit your car its their fault!!!!!!! yes because you were backing out and they hit your car its their fault!!!!!!!
In most states, fault lies with the person who had the "last clear chance" to avoid the accident. If you saw the car backing up at you and just sat there and let it hit you, it's your fault. If you saw the car backing up and thought "I can get past them" and instead hit them, it's your fault.
If you are hit from behind it is usually always the guy that hit you that is at fault unless you were in reverse backing up
Yes, at least partially. If the moving car was being operated recklessly at the time it hit you, the other driver may also be partly liable.
The car to the rear, unless the car struck was backing. Depends on the situation.
You are at fault - The charge where I one worked was, "Backing Without Caution."
The vehicle that was performing the backing maneuver is generally always the one at fault.
Well if you were backing in and hit someone then it is your fault. But if they hit you, then it is their fault.
Most defintley his fault, you were backing out, he should have saw you first.
It depends on whether or not the car is stationary at the time of the accident. If your car is stationary and they stumble into it, then they are at fault. However, if your car is moving when they are hit then you're at fault.