Want this question answered?
yes
The people that were involved in the conscription debate were the parents of the boys because they didn't agree. :)
Text her mom and debate about her punishment and see what you can do. -experienced Teen.
The senates meet in the capital building to debate laws.
Except for extreme cases such as treason, we no longer use capital punishment for crimes other than homicide. We used to execute people for rape, but this is no longer the case. If you want to find out more you can read up on the Capital Punishment Debate on Wikipedia. There are references to other really good articles that go into great detail, look for scholars such as Louis Pojman or Hugo Bedau.
In the book "The Bet" by Anton Chekhov, the discussion at the party revolves around a debate on whether capital punishment or imprisonment for life is the more humane form of punishment. The banker argues that death is a preferable punishment, while the lawyer believes life imprisonment is more humane.
Daniel Webster and Henry Clay were the two men involved in the "Great Debate."
Capital punishment's history in the United States is basically a debate between two ways of viewing the world: that state-sanctioned death is necessary for society, and that a civilized society should not see death as the only fair way to punish any crime or criminal. Throughout the history of capital punishment in the United States, reformists have spoken out against capital punishment, changing the methods used to execute convicted criminals, reducing the types of crimes that deserve a death sentenced, in many cases, eliminating them and analyzing the forces that produce criminals to try to stop criminals from being created. As society continually struggles to balance the human desires for retribution and compassion, many different forces and opinions shape the continually evolving philosophy and practice of capital punishment.Short Answer: Historically - Capital Punishment (the death penalty) has been with the human race since the dawn of mankind and has existed in all cultures, in all nations, and among all peoples since that time.
James Madison
In the U.S. it was suspended in 1972 because of the case Furman v Georgia. The Supreme Court found it to be unconstitutional for a number of reasons including racial bias and that it was cruel and unusual. For more information go to Capital Punishment Debate on Wikipedia.
Starbucks is not a political organization, it is a chain of coffee shops. The gun debate is not relevant to coffee.
Retribution is basically the principle of an eye for an eye. According to Ernest Van De Haag it is the paramount reason we should punish. The difference between revenge and retribution is that revenge is emotional, personal, and there is no upper limit (punishment is never enough). On the other hand retribution is rational, delivered by the state, and is just deserts. Try to take a look at the capital punishment debate article on wikipedia. There is a section on retribution that could help you out.