Want this question answered?
No. HUD statement should come from an HUD personnel only. They are the ones who are only authorized to give such. If one person insists, never sign ahead unless you have contacted an authorized HUD agent to confirm documents.
No. Authorized Users are NOT liable for the debt, only the PRIMARY on the account is liable.
No. An authorized user is not responsible for credit card debt in any situation. Sorry, I failed to mention that the exception is if the "AU" is a spouse and the couple reside in a community property state. What if the authorized user charged on the card? Would he be held responsible for that?
In most cases, no. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.
Not unless he is on the account and it is part of the agreement with the bank, and even in that case, the bank would issue an additional card for him and any other authorized users. Per credit card company rules, the person who signed the back of the card is the only person allowed to use it, and if the signature on the back of the card doesn't match the signature on the charge draft, then an ID check is triggered and the retailer has to verify that the person presenting the card is the person named on the card. It has to be that person, not their husband/wife/etc. If the husband/wife is an authorized user on the wife/husband's account, the credit card issuer would issue an additional card for that authorized user.
may develop after someone has experienced or witnessed an actual or threatened
To be an authorized person is to have authority to do something. The train's engineer is the only person authorized to blow the train's whistle.
Yes but only with desert boots and not sage green. Sage green boots areonly authorized with sage green socks.
"Authorized Personnel Only"
Contracting Officer
AnnualCreditReport.com is the only authorized site to receive your free credit report under US law.
The answer is no. Subpoenas are served to a person or entity, and only to that person or entity or an authorized person. For a subpoena to a person it has to be served only to that person or to someone living with that person at the residence. In the case of an entity it has to be served to someone who is authorized to accept a subpoena on behalf of the entity.
Issued by the US Army (purchased in the clothing sales department actually); authorized by President Kennedy. During the Viet War ONLY THE GREEN BERET were authorized the beret. Today everybody can wear them, in different colors too.
The person authorized to write checks on an account is called the account holder or account operating customer. He/she is the only person authorized to write checks on that account. Nobody else can do so. (In case of a joint account, all holders of the account can write checks)
Only person authorized to sign using red ink is the Commanding Officer. review correspondence manual. I have seen CO's use blue ink. XO is usually green.
If they are only an authorized signer then the bank account will not be touched. If they are listed on the account as a user, it could be frozen at any time.
Only the court, or an authorized court official, has the pwoer to issue and/or serve subpoenas. As a party to a case you can request that a subpoena be issued, but if it is in reference to the case at issue, it is HIGHLY unlikely the court will do so.