Trail jury, i think
trial jury
trial jury :P
In the United States, decisions in cases that come to trial are typically made by a jury of peers in a jury trial. These juries are composed of citizens selected from the community who assess the evidence presented during the trial and determine the facts of the case. In criminal cases, a unanimous verdict is usually required for a conviction or acquittal, while in civil cases, a majority or supermajority may suffice. The jury's role is to impartially evaluate the evidence and deliver a verdict based on their findings.
Trial courts create legal precedent known as case law. This precedent is based on the decisions made in individual cases and can be used as a guide for future similar cases.
Trial courts are where cases are initially heard and evidence is presented, while appellate courts review decisions made by trial courts. Appellate courts do not hear new evidence or witnesses, but instead review the legal reasoning and procedures used in the trial court. The differences impact the legal process by providing a system of checks and balances, ensuring that decisions are fair and consistent with the law. Appellate courts can overturn or uphold decisions made by trial courts, leading to potential changes in legal precedent and outcomes of cases.
A review court is one which has appellate jurisdiction rather original jurisdiction over cases. Courts with original jurisdiction hear cases at the trial level only. Courts with appellate jurisdiction cannot hear trials. They only review decisions made by trial courts to ensure that those decisions were correctly rendered.
precedent {APEX}
Most criminal cases result in a plea bargain or trial verdict, while civil cases often settle out of court. Ultimately, the outcome depends on the available evidence, legal arguments, and decisions made by the parties involved.
Under most circumstances the US District Courts are the federal trial courts of general jurisdiction; however, they also hear appeals of federal agency decisions made by Administrative Law Judges (for example, appeals of Social Security Disability cases).
An appellate court reviews decisions made by a trial court to determine if any legal errors were made. It differs from a trial court in that it does not hear witnesses or new evidence, but rather focuses on the legal arguments and procedures used in the original trial.
Decisions made by a state appeals court are binding on lower courts within the same state, meaning that trial courts must follow the legal principles established by the appeals court. Additionally, the decisions are typically binding on subsequent cases involving similar facts and legal issues within that jurisdiction. However, these decisions do not bind other state appeals courts or federal courts, as they operate under different jurisdictions and legal precedents.
Cases generally begin in trial courts, also known as courts of first instance. In these courts, evidence is presented, and facts are heard and decided upon by a judge or jury. Depending on the jurisdiction, trial courts may be referred to as district courts, circuit courts, or superior courts. The decisions made in these courts can often be appealed to higher appellate courts.