Want this question answered?
listens to the evidence presented then renders a decision of guilt or innocence
Quick at making a decision of guilt or innocence. Opposite of a "HUNG" jury.
In a criminal trial, the jury's verdict must be unanimous in order to convict the defendant of guilt. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, it results in a hung jury and could lead to a mistrial.
The judge asked, "Has the jury reached a decision about the guilt or innocence of this defendant?"
A petit jury is the same thing as a trial jury. This is a panel of jurors selected by lawyers and a judge to hear evidence and fact concerning either a civil or criminal case. They are charged with determining either guilt or innocence, pro or con or whatever decision they are charged with.
In criminal law, "guilt" is being found to be involved in the commission of an offense. "Innocence" is not having been involved in any offense. CAUTION: The terms "innocent" and "not guilty" are NOT synonymous - do NOT mean the same thing - and do not have the same meaning under the law.
In the 16th century, guilt or innocence was often determined through various methods including trial by ordeal, trial by combat, and trial by jury. These trials relied on supernatural beliefs or physical strength to establish innocence. Confessions obtained through torture were also commonly used as evidence of guilt.
Guilt is determined IF the prosecution can present evidence to convince a jury (or in the case of a non-jury trial, a judge) beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.
Innocence.
Two conditions placed on criminal trials are that the accused must be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and that the burden of proof lies on the prosecution to establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
An indictment, which will cause the person indicted to be arrested and proceed to a trial by a petit jury to determine guilt or innocence.
No, the opposite of arrogance is humility. The opposite of guilt is innocence.