Want this question answered?
Yes, there were multiple eyewitness accounts of the Mount Etna eruption. Eyewitnesses, including tourists and local residents, reported seeing a large column of ash and smoke rising from the volcano, along with lava flowing down its slopes. Some captured photos and videos of the eruption, which were widely shared on social media and news outlets.
The unexpected catastrophe It is certain that when the eruption of Vesuvius started on the morning of 24 August, AD 79, it caught the local population utterly unprepared. Although at the same time, as we now know in retrospect, all the tell-tale signs were there to warn them. It is mainly thanks to the vivid eye-witness account of the younger Pliny (a Roman administrator and poet, whose many vivid letters have been preserved), that we have some understanding of what happened. And it is through him that we can gain insight into the reactions and feelings of the people caught up in the drama of this natural catastrophe. Pliny's account leaves no doubt that everyone was caught unprepared. His uncle, known as Pliny the Elder, was stationed in command of the imperial naval base at Misenum, on the north-west extremity of the Bay of Naples. He was not only the senior military officer in the district, but possibly the most well informed living Roman on matters of natural science. His 37-volume Natural History is the longest work on science in Latin that has survived from antiquity. But for all his science and his seniority, his nephew tells us that the elder Pliny was relaxing, after a bath and lunch, when Vesuvius started to erupt. And the sighting of a column of smoke 'like an umbrella pine' on the far side of the Bay triggered a response more of curiosity than of alarm in him. He and his companions were evidently not anticipating such an event. The same account reveals, however, that the signs were there. Pliny's casual reference to earth tremors 'which were not particularly alarming because they are frequent in Campania' reveals the Roman's comprehensive ignorance of the link between seismic activity (earth tremors) and volcanic activity. The volcanologists of today constantly monitor any changes in levels of seismic activity from the observatory on Vesuvius, because they know that the same increase of activity in the deep reservoir of magma (molten or partially molten rock beneath the Earth's surface) causes both earth tremors and volcanic eruptions. Through measuring seismic activity, these scientists expect to predict an approaching eruption months in advance. They also know that the activity of Vesuvius is recurrent, and that the longer the intervals between one eruption and another, the greater the eventual explosion will be. The frequent but low-level activity of Vesuvius in recent centuries has relieved the build-up of pressure in the magma chamber. The catastrophic magnitude of the eruption of AD 79 was connected with the extended period of inactivity that preceded it. A long interval combined with mounting seismic activity is a sure sign of impending disaster. Of course, the Romans could not know this, and our own knowledge owes much to the care of Pliny's description. The long inactivity of the volcano naturally lulled the people of the region into a false sense of security, though they were aware of the signs of burning at the peak of the mountain. They were not the first to be so lulled: recent excavations at the site of the new NATO base at Gricignano, on the north of the Bay, have revealed two catastrophic eruptions that preceded that of 79, and wiped out the populations of a densely occupied territory. The most important earlier eruption, known as that of the 'Avellino pumice' occurred around 1800 BC; several sites, especially one near Nola, reveal the destruction of Bronze Age settlements, with their huts and pots and pans and livestock. But of this the Romans knew nothing.
It would be terrifying to witness an avalanche, especially if one of your group is caught in it.
I believe you are referring to testimony and exhibits.
To witness one complete revolution of the planet Pluto, you would have to be at least 248 years old.
Yes, in fact, most people did survive; roughly about 2,000 people died as a result of the eruption. If no one did, then we would know nothing of the eruption. Pliny the Younger, a senator of his day, was an eye witness.
Pliny the Younger was a survivor from the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79. He wrote a diary about the event because he saw the eruption across the bay from Naples and he wasn't in Pompeii while it was happening. He is how we know about the burial of Pompeii.
The Volcano dubbed Vesuvius erupted in 79AD, burying the greek town of Pompeii in volcanic ash and burying many of the inhabitants. There are some eye-witness accounts that still survive.
In the UK: Yes. Provided they have nothing to gain from the Will.
Yes, there were multiple eyewitness accounts of the Mount Etna eruption. Eyewitnesses, including tourists and local residents, reported seeing a large column of ash and smoke rising from the volcano, along with lava flowing down its slopes. Some captured photos and videos of the eruption, which were widely shared on social media and news outlets.
The Battle of Saratoga.
From eye-witness testimony...they are History.
- Police are appealing for witnesses to the accident.- I was a witness to one of the most amazing comebacks in soccer history
sue ruff nelson retain and venus durgan and John Lienhard are the 4 witness
Terrible hardship and suffering.
An inimical witness refers to a witness who is hostile or unfriendly towards a party in a legal case, typically providing testimony that is detrimental to that party's interests. The concept comes from common law and is often encountered in courts when a witness's impartiality or credibility is in question due to their relationship with one of the parties involved. Inimical witnesses can significantly impact the outcome of a case by influencing the judge or jury through their biased testimony.
The possessive form of witness is witness's