It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both. ... Niccolo Machiavelli
Kurt Cobain.
It is much better to be feared than loved for the purpose of retaining authority owing to dread of punishment.
no it's not!....being lovedd is way more important than being feared. yeah fear =respect but no love= being lonely....everyone needs love
Niccolo Machiavelli
It simply means it's better to be feared than loved. Some like to be feared more because when someone fears a person they usually are to scared of them to fight back. But it's more of an opinion because some people would rather be loved
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat, philosopher, and writer, wrote in "The Prince" that it is safer for a ruler to be feared than loved if they cannot be both. He argued that fear is a more reliable means of maintaining power and control.
He believed this because if the people of the town/city loved him, they may get comfortable with him and not do the work they are assighned to
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher and writer, famously argued in his work "The Prince" that it is better for a ruler to be feared than loved in order to maintain power and control. Machiavelli believed that fear was a more effective tool for ensuring obedience and loyalty from subjects.
Machiavelli argues that it is difficult to be both loved and feared, but if a prince has to choose, it is safer to be feared. Being loved is fickle and prone to change, while fear is more consistent in maintaining control over the people. A prince who is both loved and feared can navigate different situations better and maintain a stronger grip on power.
Machiavelli believed that a ruler must be both feared and loved, but if they cannot be both, it is better to be feared than loved. He also emphasized the importance of being cunning, adaptable, and willing to act ruthlessly when necessary to maintain power.
What he meant is that, after conquering new territory, you can expect resistance to your rule, unless the locals love you enough not to want to rebel, or are so weak that they do not have the means. What he said is that it would be best to be both loved and feared, but since that is impossible, it is safer if people cannot challenge your rule than if they can, but don't want to.
Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.
It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all