answersLogoWhite

0

Edwin Hubble showed that galaxies exist and he correlated galaxies to redshifts.

However, Hubble did not conclude that the redshift indicates the universe is expanding. Unfortunately, lesser Physicists have rushed to the conclusion that the Universe is expanding. Much of tthis is because Einstein's Relativity Equations only had solutions for expansion or contraction. of the two, Lemaitre called for expansion in his Big Bang, and this is the situation today.

Here is Hubble's position from an article:

http://apod.NASA.gov/diamond_jubilee/1996/sandage_hubble.html

Hubble concluded that his observed log N(m) distribution showed a large departure from Euclidean geometry, provided that the effect of redshifts on the apparent magnitudes was calculated as if the redshifts were due to a real expansion. A different correction is required if no motion exists, the redshifts then being due to an unknown cause. Hubble believed that his count data gave a more reasonable result concerning spatial curvature if the redshift correction was made assuming no recession. To the very end of his writings he maintained this position, favouring (or at the very least keeping open) the model where no true expansionexists, and therefore that the redshift "represents a hitherto unrecognized principle of nature". This viewpoint is emphasized (a) in The Realm of the Nebulae, (b) in his reply (Hubble 1937a) to the criticisms of the 1936 papers by Eddington and by McVittie, and (c) in his 1937 Rhodes Lectures published as The Observational Approach to Cosmology (Hubble 1937b). It also persists in his last published scientific paper which is an account of his Darwin Lecture (Hubble 1953).

The redshift is still an unrecognized principle of nature, The redshift is an indicator of Continuity, the balance between the centrifugal forces and the centripetal forces. Gravity potential energy gives the centripetal force and the vector energy gives the centrifugal force. Now some physicists deny the existence of centrifugal force. The fact is there is a centrifugal fforce and it is produced by the so-called "Dark Energy", which those same physicists affirm.

Hubble is correct, the Universe is not expanding and the redshift is no longer an unrecognized principle in nature, it is the "Fine Structure 'Constant' of matter, v/c is the redshift = square-root(GM/rc2).

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who showed other galaxies existed and observed the universe is expanding?

Edwin Hubble


Who showed other galaxies existed and observed the universe expanding?

Edward Hubble


Who showed that other galaxies existed and observed that the universe expanding?

Eddie Hubble


Who showed that other galaxies existed and observed that the universe was expanding?

Edwin hubble >:d


Who was the person that showed that the other galaxies existed and observed that the universe is expanding?

Edwin Hubble ;3


Who showed that other galaxies existed and observed that the universe i s expanding?

Edwin Hubble, after whom the space telescope was named.


Who showed other galaxies existed and the universe is expanding?

Edwin Hubble


Who showed that other galaxies existed and obsserved that the universe is expanding?

Edwin Hubble.


How is it possible that the universe could have existed for an infinite amount of time in the same state if galaxies are continuously receding from each other?

The universe has not existed in the same state for an infinite amount of time, that would be the steady state theory, which has been replaced by the big bang theory. The galaxies are moving away from each other because the universe is expanding at an increasing rate. It has been expanding since the big bang happened 13.7 billion years ago.


Who showed that other galaxies existed and observed that the univeres is expanded?

Edwin Hubble


How is it possible that the universe could have existed for an infinite amount of time if the galaxies are constantly receding from each other?

According to prevailing theories the universe has not existed for an infinite amount of time but is approximately fourteen billion years old.


How does the energy of the cosmic microwave background compare to the energy radiated by all the stars and galaxies that ever existed?

The energy of the cosmic microwave background is about 400,000 times less than the energy of all the stars and galaxies that ever existed. The CMB is the remnant radiation from the early universe, while the energy radiated by stars and galaxies have been accumulating over millions of years.