answersLogoWhite

0

Who starts first the plaintiff or the defense?

Updated: 8/20/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Best Answer

The plaintiff - their legal representative outlines the case for the prosecution. It's then up to the defence barrister to answer the allegations on behalf of the defendant.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who starts first the plaintiff or the defense?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What factors does a defense use in civil case against the plaintiff?

Your question is too broad to be answered as written, as the nature of the defense depends upon the cause of action asserted by the Plaintiff.


What defense provides justification of a tort?

The defense of consent can provide justification of a tort if the defendant can show that the plaintiff agreed to the conduct that caused the harm. This defense asserts that the plaintiff willingly accepted the risk associated with the defendant's actions.


What does plain tiff mean?

Plaintiff is the party who starts a lawsuit.


What is the preferred defense in a negligence suit?

The preferred defense in a negligence suit is to argue that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff, did not breach that duty, or that the plaintiff's own actions contributed to their injury (contributory negligence or assumption of risk). Additionally, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff's injury was not directly caused by their actions.


What does representation by counsel mean?

It generally means the access by a plaintiff to a lawyer who directs his defense.


What is the difference between an affirmative defense and a denial?

A denial does just that it denies the Plaintiff's allegations and the burden of proof is still on the Plaintiff to prove the prima facie case.An affirmative defense does not deny the allegations but asserts a defense that would negate the legal effect of the Plaintiff's cause of action. The burden of proof in an affirmative defense is on the Defendant.An example would be a breach of contract case. The Plaintiff claims that he had a contract with the Defendant, and Defendant did not perform the contract. A denial would say "We never had a contract" and the Plaintiff would have to prove the existence of a contract. An affirmative defense would say "Yes, we had a contract, but that was 20 years ago thus the action is barred by the 10 year statute of limitations." Then the burden of proof is on the Defendant to show that the contract falls outside of the statute of limitations period.


What are the two side in a criminal trial?

The sides in a civil trial are the same as a criminal trial. There is a plaintiff and a defendant. In a criminal trial the plaintiff is usually the jurisdictioni charging the defendant.


In tort claim if plaintiff's attorney does call a witness to testify can defense call same witness to testify against plaintiff?

The plaintiff is not required to provide witnesses to a case, per se; although they must prove their case (It is very hard to do without at least one witness, normally the plaintiff alone). In either case however the defense is not limited in its ability to call any witness to the case, as long as the plaintiff is notified of the witness who will appear and the witness will provide material testimony about the case.Additional: The defense cannot elicit brand-new testimony from the plaintiffs witness, however the witness is subject to cross-examination by the defense, who will try to either draw out testimony favorable to his client, or to impeach the testimony that the witness gave on direct examination.


Is Plaintiff a common noun or a proper noun?

The noun plaintiff is a common noun; lower case unless it starts a sentence. The noun Plaintiff is a proper noun when used to name a specific plaintiff; for example, Plaintiff: Malcolm M. Malcolm or Malcolm M. Malcolm, Plaintiff.


Is Consent a defense to the tort of battery?

Consent is a defense to the tort of battery if the plaintiff willingly and knowingly agreed to the harmful or offensive contact that resulted in the battery. If valid consent was given, it can serve as a defense against a claim of battery.


Who side speaks first in court?

the plaintiff


Can an expert witness for defense be the plaintiff's medical doctor?

I believe that any lawyer would consider this to be a conflict of interest, and not allowed.