Mario J. Molina, a Mexican scientist, won the Nobel Prize in 1995 (along with Paul J. Crutzen and F. Sherwood Rowland) for studies of the ozone layer and the threat from CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons).
Ozone layer is studied by the help of satellites or probes. They calculate the concentration of ozone in the layer.
Not by anyone that has studied the problem.
Mario j molina studied the ozone layer.
Because they haven't studied or understood it properly. There is practically no connection between ozone depletion and global warming.
Scientists are studying climate and the ozone layer. Antarctica affects the whole world.
The substance O3CHNa refers to sodium ozonide, which is a chemical compound containing sodium (Na) and the ozonide ion (O3). It can be formed by the reaction of ozone (O3) with sodium. Sodium ozonide is often studied for its potential applications in organic synthesis and its role in ozone chemistry.
The ozone layer was first discovered by French physicists Charles Fabry and Henri Buisson in 1913. Later, it was further studied and brought to worldwide attention by British scientists Joe Farman, Brian Gardiner, and Jonathan Shanklin in the 1980s.
The ozone layer is imaged by shining light of different frequencies (frequencies only ozone can respond to) down on the Earth at different angles, and seeing how strong the light "backscatter" is. Satellites do this from orbit. It is too difficult to make a large number of ground stations, and make a good global map. See the link below for more information.
No. The ozone is stratosphere is good ozone. The ozone in troposphere is bad ozone.
The tropospheric ozone is bad ozone. It acts as a pollutant.
Stratosphere ozone is good ozone. Photo chemical ozone is pollutant.
Most of the ozone is found there. The ozone present there is good ozone.