James Madison hadn't yet taken office when Marbury's and his co-plaintiffs' justice of the peace commissions failed to materialize. Levi Lincoln, the US Attorney General in Jefferson's administration, was temporarily responsible for Madison's job. Lincoln testified he didn't know the ultimate fate of the missing documents, but implied they may have been destroyed.
According to a partial trial transcript from February 1803, it appears Jefferson may have disposed of approximately 12 commissions himself (including those for Marbury, et al.), ostensibly because he believed the number excessive. Five of the remaining commissions were allegedly reassigned to members of Jefferson's Democratic-Republican party, and the remainder were delivered to the original parties.
It appears James Madison was the nominal (in name only) defendant in the lawsuit because he occupied the office of Secretary of State, the position officially responsible for recording, sealing and delivering the justice of the peace documents. Madison was not personally involved in the case.
Case Citation:
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
For more information on Marbury v. Madison, (1803) and the Midnight Judges, see Related Questions, below.
Thomas Jefferson ordered James Madison not to deliver the commissions for the "midnight judges" appointed by his predecessor, John Adams, because he believed the appointments were politically motivated and aimed at entrenching Federalist power in the judiciary. Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican, viewed this as an overreach of executive authority and sought to prevent the Federalists from gaining further influence in the government. This decision ultimately led to the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, which established the principle of judicial review.
President Thomas Jefferson refused to appoint William Marbury to the judgeship. Marbury was one of the "midnight judges" appointed by outgoing President John Adams, but Jefferson, believing the appointments were politically motivated, instructed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver the commissions. This refusal led to the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, which established the principle of judicial review.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
midnight judges midnight judges
midnight or midnight judges!
The Midnight Judges, appointed by President John Adams in the final hours of his presidency, were important because they helped shape the judiciary branch of the U.S. government. The appointments fueled the debate over the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches and had long-lasting implications for the interpretation of the Constitution. The controversy surrounding the Midnight Judges also led to the landmark Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, which established the principle of judicial review.
The "Midnight Judges" were 42 Federalist justices of the peace President John Adams appointed immediately before his administration ended and Thomas Jefferson's began. They were appointed because Adams realized the Federalist party was losing power and control in government to the Democratic-Republicans (who also called themselves "anti-Federalists,").The Midnight Judges were symbolically important, but had little judicial power and only served five-year terms. They were appointed as a matter of patronage (a reward to a loyal political supporter) under the Organic Act of 1801 (for the District of Columbia), and were not part of the court-packing scheme devised under the Judiciary Act of 1801, that allowed Adams and the Federalist-dominated Congress to appoint a number of judges to Article III constitutional courts.Those judges represented a real problem for incoming President Jefferson, because they received lifetime appointments and would have had a political and ideological impact on the US government for decades to come. The Midnight Judges, on the other hand, posed no political threat, but Jefferson allegedly believed John Adams had appointed an excessive number and withheld some of their commissions. They may also have been an annoying reminder of Adams' clever court-packing scheme, but that's a different story.Several of the Midnight Judges whose commissions were withheld attempted to compel their delivery by filing suit in the US Supreme Court. These men played an important role in a landmark US Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, (1803), and were ultimately of more historical importance than the higher federal judges.For more information about Marbury v. Madison and the midnight judges, see Related Questions, below.
the midnight judges
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The secretary of state who refused to deliver a judge's appointment was James Madison. This incident occurred in the early 1800s during the case of Marbury v. Madison, where William Marbury's appointment as a justice of the peace was not finalized. The refusal to deliver the commission became a pivotal moment in establishing the principle of judicial review in the United States.
Midnight Judges (study Island) (your welcome)
The term midnight judges is a derogatory Republican term referring to Federalist judges appointed at the last minute by President Adams. The new judges were known as the Midnight Judges because Adams was said to be signing their appointments at midnight prior to President Thomas Jefferson's inauguration.