Neils Bohr
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
paradigm
paradigm
first of all they have to follow the scientific method. then they have to publish it in a scientific journal. then it has to gain publicity and be replicated by multiple scientists
New ideas may contradict existing, accepted ideas.
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on evidence, experimental results, and how well they align with existing theories and principles. Ideas that can be tested, replicated, and provide new insights into the natural world are more likely to be accepted. Peer review by other experts in the field also plays a crucial role in evaluating the validity and significance of new scientific ideas.
The most accepted form of scientific ideas are those that are supported by strong evidence, reproducible experiments, and consensus among experts in the field. These ideas are often published in reputable scientific journals and have stood up to rigorous scrutiny and testing.
because some scientific theories are not true for this advanced world. e.g. the early ideas about phlogiston.
The pair of ideas central to the scientific revolution were empiricism, the idea that knowledge should be based on observation and experience, and skepticism, the questioning of accepted beliefs and ideas in order to seek truth through logical reasoning and evidence.
New scientific ideas typically go through a process of scrutiny, evaluation, and testing before being accepted by the scientific community. This process involves peer review, replication of experiments, and validation by multiple independent studies. Only when an idea has been thoroughly tested and supported by evidence will it be widely accepted by the scientific community.
Most of Darwin's ideas, such as natural selection and common descent, are widely accepted in the scientific community today. However, some aspects of his work, like the mechanisms of heredity and the pace of evolution, have been refined and expanded upon with more recent scientific discoveries.
yes he did ^_^