0
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
The Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoDuring the 244-year period of the monarchy the king led the army. At the beginning of the 482-year period of the republic the consuls, the two annually elected heads of the republic, led the army. Then a new elected office of state, the praetorship, was created. The praetors were chiefs of justices who also held imperium, the power to command an army. The consuls and praetors could also have their power to command an army (but not their civil functions) extended (usually for one year) and their titles became proconsul and propraetor. During the 506-year period of rule by emperors, the emperors could lead an army, but not all emperors fought wars and there were many legions. The legions were commanded by a legatus.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe "Roman army" is a term that encompasses several aspects. First of all the army was made up of legions. A legion could be an army in itself depending how it was deployed. There were times when several legions acting together made up an army. Okay, the head of a legion was called a Legate an he was in charge of his army/legion. Now, during the republic, the senate was in charge of the military, specifically the consuls. If there were trouble and a full blown war was going on, the senate would designate several legions to one man in order to end hostilities. Men such as Marius, Sulla, Pompey and Caesar were given their commands by the senate. From the time of Augustus, the emperor was in charge of the army, taking the place of the senate.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe Romans did not have a commander in chief as we know it, although at the time of the principate you could say that the emperor was the commander in chief. Their system worked differently than ours. For example, when there was trouble, the senate would appoint a general and give him a number of legions or give him the authority to raise new legions. The fellow appointed general was the commander in chief of the legions under his command, but of no others. Pompey and Caesar are examples. each man had his legions and was commander in chief of them and no others.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoYes. During the principate the emperor was the commander-in-chief and during the republic the consuls had the job. Many times this power was delegated as the emperor or the senate would authorize a general to raise/lead a certain number of legions for a campaign.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoA leader of a century in the Roman army was called a centurion.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoWiki User
∙ 12y agoAugustus
Wiki User
∙ 12y agosaton
Mariyah Ahmed Y07
legate
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who defeated the slave army?
Marcus Licinius Crassus led Roman legions to defeat the slave army of Spartacus.
Did the roman army ever develop a calvary?
Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.
Who won the battle of queen boudicca?
The Roman army led by Gaius Suetonius Paulinus defeated Boudicca's forces.
Who was a roman centurion and why was he important?
A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.A Roman centurion was an officer in the Roman army. As there were eleven grades of centurions, he could be in charge of as few as 80 men or the entire camp. The centurions who led the centuries or the cohorts were men who led by example in battle. Consequently they had the highest casualty rates. A centurion was important as a leader and as an administrator.
Who was in te Roman army?
Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.
What wreaked the Roman army?
Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.
How was roman general scipio different from Hannibal?
As an elected magistrate, he led an army of Roman citizens. Hannibal led a mercenary army for the Carthaginians.
Who led the roman army in the third punic war?
Scipio Aemilianus.
In roman The consuls led the government and?
In Rome, in addition to leading the government, the consuls also led the army.
Who led first roman army to Britain?
Julius Caesar
Who defeated the slave army?
Marcus Licinius Crassus led Roman legions to defeat the slave army of Spartacus.
Which army finally took Corinth?
In 146 BCE the Roman army led by Lucius Mummius beseiged and captured Corinth.
How did Boadicea resist the Roman invasion?
She mobilised her tribe and others to provide a force which could challenge Roman military rulership.
Why should you join the roman army?
dude , Julius led the roman army nut head.
Who was boudccia?
Boudica (Boudicca) was a Celtic queen who led an armed revolt against the Roman army .
Did the roman army ever develop a calvary?
Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.Yes, the Roman army had a cavalry which consisted of auxiliaries and some Romans who could stay on a horse. The cavalry was an integral part of the legion, both in battle and in scouting. The cavalry units were always led by Roman officers.
Who was the Roman general who helped with the Second Punic War?
Scipio Africanus led the Roman army in the final phase of the Second Punic War
