Want this question answered?
Slavery, Political, and Democracy.
Slavery, Political, and Democracy.
Since "Manifest Destiny" was the belief that the U.S. was ordained by God to spread to the Pacific Ocean, the annexation of Mexican territory is the best answer here. The other issues deal with slavery or slavery in the territories of the United States.
Southern Democrats who favored both slavery and Manifest Destiny.
Slavery and manifest destiny, which were the real reasons behind such conflict.
Borders, slavery and Manifest Destiny. See related questions for further details.
Since "Manifest Destiny" was the belief that the U.S. was ordained by God to spread to the Pacific Ocean, the annexation of Mexican territory is the best answer here. The other issues deal with slavery or slavery in the territories of the United States.
Manifest destiny and slavery on acquired territories (specially Texas) motivated such conquest. See related questions.
whether slavery would spread across the United States
He was against it. Charles Sumner is also best known for being beat unconscious with a cane in the senate by a South Carolina congressman.
One policy of Jacksonian democracy was to avoid divisive debates over slavery. Another policy was the support of Manifest Destiny and westward expansion.
Manifest destiny started the dispute over the spread of slavery. Since before the Mexican-American War the states had argued about annexing new territory because of the spread of slavery. Also, this is more of a underlying factor and a personal opinion, I think that the northern population wanted to preserve the union so badly because the media had been perching manifest destiny for so long people didn't realize how bloodily and costly expansion could be. Many Americans were wrapped up in the success the US had had expanding to the west so they didn't really understand the true costs of war.