No one know positively, but according to the Roman legends... Romulus and Remus the twin sons of the god Mars and a vestal virgin were sent down a river in a basket after birth (at Mars' command) they were rescued and suckled by a female wolf. When they became adults they decided to build a city (Rome) but during an argument Romulus killed Remus with a rock. Romulus became the first king of Rome.
The Ancient Romans.
It where the twin-brothers Romulus and Remus
The Roimans did not fight Romulus. He was the founder of the city.
As to the founder of Rome, you have a choice. Romulus or Aeneas. They are both myths and the Romans used each of them.
romans
Greeks and ancient Romans. Scotland and England being the co-founder of the organised game.
AeneasAnswer 2Greek mythology did not bother with Romans. Aeneas belongs to the Roman mythology.
Your question is unclear. If you mean who WAS the first leader of THE RomanS, it was Romulus. He was the founder of Rome and its first king.
There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.
No, the founder of Byzantium was actually Greek colonist name, Byzas (so obviously he named the city after himself) in 667 BC. And as it is such a strategic location - only way to Black Sea, many city fought over this location but finally it became part Roman Empire.
Well this is sort of a trick question because the founder of Rome was from Athens. But the answer is Athens because the US is not a empire that rapidly expands. This is also a democracy.
The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.The Roman people regarded Romulus as their sacred founder. They considered him the George Washington of ancient Rome.