ARMY ARMY ARMY ARMY ARMY ARMY ARMY
From among the generals who offered the armies the biggest bribes-
They were chosen by the Army. Whoever the army thought was most likely to succeed as emperor would control them and therefore the power.
The throne was sold to the highest bidder and/or the emperors were killed shortly after crowned. Legions fought for their head to be emperors.
None, there is no antonym for barrack
Beairic (military barrack)
Rome fell because of a to big of an army to sustain, pushing its boundaries to far which let to nomadic invisions, having military leaders that had more power than the emperor (barrack leaders), and barrack emperors constantly getting assassinated which lead to chaos in the streets. The final blow was the germaniac peoples killing the emperor and sacking Rome
The word barrack originates from French
Barrack Field was created in 1754.
Sandown Barrack Battery was created in 1863.
since a "barrack" is a bed, an antonym for "bed" would be "superstructure"
Since you didn't name a specific person I will answer this in a general way. Emperors were seen as chosen by God and the people they ruled had no say in what they did.
Roman emperors were primarily chosen through a combination of hereditary succession and political maneuvering. Initially, emperors were often the sons or relatives of previous rulers, but as the empire evolved, military leaders and influential political figures, including the Senate, played key roles in selecting emperors. In some cases, emperors were proclaimed by the army, especially during times of crisis or civil war. Ultimately, the method of selection varied throughout the history of the Roman Empire.