If John had really been the author of the gospel that now bears his name, then his father would have been Zebedee and his brother would have been James.
We do not know the name of the author of the gospel now known as John's Gospel, since it was written anonymously and only attributed to the disciple John later in the second century. some believe the author of John's Gospel was also the author of the Epistle of John; certainly the Epistle of John came out of the same community as John's Gospel. If so, this author wrote both a gospel and an epistle in the New Testament.
John Conran has written: 'A journal of the life and gospel labours of John Conran'
The concept of Jesus Christ as the Word of God was developed by the author of John's Gospel.
The Gospel of John is traditionally attributed to the Apostle John, one of Jesus' disciples. The three epistles of John are also traditionally believed to have been written by the same author, although the identity of the author is not explicitly mentioned within the texts themselves.
It is believed that the author of the Gospel of John chose not to mention himself by name to emphasize the focus on Jesus and his teachings rather than on the author himself. This decision could also be to create an air of humility and anonymity surrounding the writer.
who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives who are john Dalton famous relatives
John's Gospel differs so markedly from the three other New Testament gospels as to raise questions about the very reason for this. Some theologians have long felt that John, a disciple of Jesus, wrote his Gospel in order to correct misconceptions evident in the other, synoptic gospels.However, this hypothesis depends on the author of John's Gospel actually being the disciple John. In fact, the Gospel, like all others, was actually written anonymously and only attributed to the apostle John later in the second century, when the Church Fathers were seeking to establish who probably wrote each of the gospels. Around 180 CE, Irenaeus identified the author of this gospel as John, son of Zebedee. This arose because it was believed that the 'disciple whom Jesus loved' was the apostle John. It seems then to have been decided, on the basis of amateur psychology, that the author must have been John, because the author was too modest.Today, most scholars assume that John did not write this Gospel. In fact, they say that the author could not have been an eyewitness to the events that the gospel portrays. Just as scholars have identified Mark's Gospel as the major source of information for the authors of Matthew and Luke, so they say that John was inspired by Luke's Gospel, although some material was taken direct from Mark. John's Gospel is entirely derivative and is not an attempt to correct the gospel record.Perhaps the last word could go to the early Church Father, Origen, who in defending John's Gospel said (Commentary on John) "although he does not always tell the truth literally, he always tells it spiritually." Origen did not believe John's Gospel to be literally true.
A:We know nothing about the author of the Book of Revelations, who is commonly known as "John of Patmos" because of his introduction in the Book. However, many Christians believe him to be the author of John's Gospel, in spite of the style and theological differences. If the apostle John, brother of James, was the author of John's Gospel (which many New Testament scholars doubt), then he could not have been the author of Revelation.
A:It is traditional to believe that 1 John was written by the author of John's Gospel, so the first thing to recognise is that both 1 John and John's Gospel were originally anonymous and only attributed to the disciple John later in the second century. Scholars say that the Gospel could not have been written by an eyewitness to the events it portrays, thus ruling out John or any other disciple as its author. In fact, a careful analysis of John's Gospel shows that it was actually inspired by Luke's Gospel. 1 John and John's Gospel were certainly written in the same community, known today as the Johannine community because of the traditional association with John, and 1 John shows evidence of a split in the community.Some scholars say that 1 John was written in 3 stratas and by various authors. Whether 1 John had a single author, a team of authors or was written over time, with the last stage being completed early in the second century, we do not know who the author or authors were. We therefore can never say what occupation the author had.
No, Lazarus did not write the Gospel of John. The Gospel of John is traditionally attributed to the apostle John, not Lazarus.
Gospel Folio Press
The fourth gospel was written anonymously and attributed to the disciple John, later in the second century, on the grounds that the "disciple whom Jesus loved" seemed to refer to John and the Church Fathers believed the author may have been referring to himself when saying "disciple whom Jesus loved". Outside the Bible, there is no evidence that the disciple John was a historical person, and we do not know who the author of John's Gospel really was.