Spartan warfare relied on group tactics, although they did have good single combat skills. One-on-one, a samurai would probably win, as they are taught purely the art of swordfighting. However, as a group, the Spartans would probably come out on top.
Check that again, if a Spartan could beat a ninja like on deadliest warrior, it could definitly beat a samurai, if it came that close to a viking
He is correct, as it was proven on deadliest warrior, and i believe the weakest spartan can definitely KO a samurai, and have a 95% chance to kill a average samurai
If you saw the deadliest warrior season 1 special you saw that samurai got 3 edges and spartan still won
A spartan
One on one a samurai would most likely win. Samurai had more advanced and better crafted weaponry, and they were trained more for one on one combat.
The samurai. While both were disciplined, fanatical warriors, the Samurai's steel weapons would outclass the Greek's bronze.
it is completely circumstantial you can't say that a ninja would kill a samurai every time and vice versa ninja and samurai fought all the time but the ninja wouldn't always win or lose same goes for the samurai
Depends... wait... no it doesn't! Samurai had 4 different classes: 1st sentry, second sentry, third sentry, and elite samurai. A spartan would wipe a samurai off his windshield like a bug! But... elite samurai v.s. regular spartan... it would probaly end in a... DRAW SPARTANS HAD shortswords, sheilds, body armor, wallabe spear, and brute strength. SAMURAI HAD kia bow, katana, omsoul club(wooden club with beads), and Honor. WINNER: SPARTAN
Spartan In a fair fight, yes Spartan would win, but Ninjas don't fight fair.
spartan, obviously
a spartan would win as they have enchancements. p.s. Germans always loose
spartan
it depends on wether or not the samurai could get past the Spartan's giant pansy shield
Apache
A spartan because of his shild and he starts training when he is one