It is always difficult to gauge who would "Win" when 2 animals never came in contact with each other.Allosaurus live in the late Jurassic Era between 155 and 145 million years ago and Tyrannosaurus Rex lived in the late Cretaceous period 68 - 65 million years ago. The last allosaurus died 77 million years before t-rex evolved.
It becomes even more difficult when you consider that we know absolutely nothing about both they're behaviour's We can however look at the evidence and make few educated guesses. It looks likely that both species were top predators of there own times. T-Rex was the bigger of the 2 at a length of 12.8m, standing 4m high and weighing probably about 6.5 tonnes compared with the largest species of allosaurus at only 8.5 m in length and weighing 2.5 tonnes. This would suggest that allosaurus would be more agile than t-rex but would sustain far more damage if t-rex managed to catch it.
It is also believed that t-rex had the largest bite force of any animal to ever exist on earth. Allosaurus however could not ever come close having a bite forse probably less than a modern day leopard. Other factors would also be significant. If you compare the skulls it would suggest that t-rex had very good binocular vision and also a large visual area of the brain, much more than allosaurus had limited binocular vision and a small visual cortex.
It is also thought that t-rex was faster than allosaurus. You also have to consider what prey they ate. Evidence suggests that allosaurus ate Sauropods, the largest land living animals of all time. Quite simply there were no dinosaurs larger than T-Rex at the end of the cretaceous. Evidence suggest that animals such as Triceratops. Allosaurus certainly had the edge here. However, if i was forced to put a wager on which would win i would my money would be on T-Rex.
a Trex would win because it's bigger has a stronger bite and has serrated teeth
Trex
trex
Giganotosaurus spinosaurus carcharodontosaurus and allosaurus.
Trex because it would step on the sandwich without even noticing.
allosaurus. due to its size rugops would have a hard time battling its large enemy unless rugops was in a group. rugops had small slicing teeth used to eat meat and grip on prey, not designed for chomping prey and allosaurus had a weak bite force but with sharper teeth so allosaurus would win. allosaurus lived during the jurassic and rugops lived during the late cretaceous
suchomimus. allosaurus would be severely injured by its enemies claws and allosaurus with its weak bite force would usually flee. suchomimus was about 2 times bigger then allosaurus but suchomimus did not prey on large animals.its teeth,and snout were designed for catching fish and small dinosaurs. if forced it would battle and they did not live in the same period.
t-rex would win because its much stronger and has the most powerful jaw
No, a Trex is bigger. Their prey included ornithopods, stegosaurids and sauropods, and there may have been some cannibalism.
No a mt could not win
Allosaurus was 28 to 32 feet long and weighed somewhere between 2,200 and 8,800 lb depending on whose estimate you use. Tyrannosaurus rex was 40 feet long and weighed 12,000 to 26,000 lb. Tyrannosaurus rex would almost definitely defeat and kill an Allosaurus in a fight unless the Allosaurus managed to escape. Note that they never would have encountered each other, though, because Allosaurus died out about 97 million years before Tyrannosaurus evolved.
T-rex was much larger than Allosaurus. It would be a colossal mismatch.
The T.rex is the "King of the Dinosaurs" so it means that it can defeat anything on it's way.