China would be the most likely to win in theory because if no allies were allowed then the british dont have much of an air force and china's navy can easily crush britain, this war is actually very unlikely to happen as they are pretty far away from each other seperated by many countries and they dont have any diplomatic issues
China
no china has much more men
England did win the American Revolutionary War.
No one. The US, Russia, and China each have sufficient nuclear weapons to lay waste to the entire globe.
There is two China's the PRC and the Republic of China that's why it was a civil war so I guess its because no matter who won China would still win.
China would win. China has more soldiers, bigger armies, better technology, and strong/growing allies.
Russia. They have way more nukes then China.
it is almost impossible to imagine such a situation as china and germany are so seperated
It would be a close fight. China has more men to fight with. China also has more reserves. China has unquestionably better navies and air forces when compared to Russia, and around 9 times the amounts of tanks. China has the largest army in human history, more than the entire population of the United States. So, in a short war, China would win. In a longer war, China would win and begin to take Russian lands, eventually scoring the victory.This is of course assuming no nuclear weapons are used. Otherwise, China would also win.Answer:China would win without really trying.
China cause they have one third of the world s population to create an army.
There is no way the Vietcong would win against China. China has the biggest army in the world. Give China the win.
The US and Red China already fought a war; Korea 1950-1953. Who would win? Man has yet to learn how to predict the future; even weather reports are not accurate.