0
Whose approach used elimination and inductive reasoning to find the cause of phenomena?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Francis Bacon
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Inductive reasoning involves making general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. Deductive reasoning starts with a general principle or hypothesis and applies it to specific cases to reach a conclusion. Inductive reasoning moves from specific to general, while deductive reasoning moves from general to specific.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction-?
Normative deductive approach starts with a theory and uses deduction to derive hypotheses, while inductive approach starts with observations and uses induction to formulate a theory. The deductive approach is useful when researchers have a strong theoretical foundation and want to test specific hypotheses, while the inductive approach is useful when exploring new areas where little theory exists. The usefulness of each approach depends on the research question and context.
What Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Deductive reasoning involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to more certain outcomes compared to inductive reasoning, which involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. Deductive reasoning follows a top-down approach, moving from the general to the specific, and is commonly used in mathematics and formal logic to guarantee valid conclusions.
What type of reasoning does qualitative research use?
Qualitative research primarily uses inductive reasoning, which involves starting with specific observations or data points and then developing general conclusions or theories based on those observations. This approach allows researchers to explore deeper meanings, perspectives, and relationships within their data.
A form of reasoning called is the process of forming general ideas and rules based on your experiences and observations?
A form of reasoning called _____________ is the process of forming general ideas and rules based on your experiences and observations induction
What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction?
Normative deductive approaches start with a general theory and apply it to specific cases, while inductive approaches start with observations and work towards general principles. Normative deductive approaches are more useful in theory construction as they allow for testing and refinement of theories based on observable data, whereas inductive approaches may lead to biased generalizations.
How do you use deductive approach?
Deductive reasoning is "process of elimination." The character Sherlock Holmes defines it thusly: "When you eliminate the impossible, what is left -- no matter how improbable -- must be the truth."
What is inductive approach in business communication?
Inductive approach is when a message withholds the major idea until accompanying details and explanations have been presented.
Inductive reasoning is an process which means it is based on experiences and observations made in the real world?
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific instances or observations. It is a bottom-up approach that uses specific examples to draw likely conclusions. This method is often used in scientific research and can lead to probable rather than absolute conclusions.
How does chisholm use inductive reasoning to support her argument?
Chisholm uses inductive reasoning by presenting specific examples or cases to support her general conclusions or claims. By highlighting patterns or trends from these examples, she aims to make a strong case for her argument based on the observed evidence. This approach allows her to draw broader conclusions from specific instances, enhancing the persuasiveness of her argument.
Is inductive or deductive reasoning the best way to approach a geometric proof?
Please remember proof gives absolute truth, which means it HAS to be true for all cases satisfying the condition. Hence, inductive reasoning will NEVER be able to be used for that ---- it only supposes that the OBSERVED is true than the rest must, that's garbage, if it's observed of course it's true (in Math), no one knows what will come next. But it's a good place to start, inductive reasoning gives a person incentive to do a full proof. Do NOT confuse inductive reasoning with inductive proof. Inductive reasoning: If a1 is true, a2 is true, and a3 is true, than a4 should be true. Inductive Proof: If a1 is true (1), and for every an, a(n+1) is true as well (2), then, since a1 is true (1), then a2 is true (2), then a3 is true (2). You see, in inductive proof, there is a process of deductive reasoning ---- proving (1) and (2). (1) is usually, just plugin case 1. (2) provides only a generic condition, asking you to derive the result (a (n+1) being true), that is deductive reasoning. In other words, proof uses implications a cause b, and b cause c hence a cause c. Inductive says though a causes c because I saw one example of it.
