answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Christian ethical thinking varies from demanding absolute obedience to word of God, to a view that there are no binding moral laws, and that everything is relative. Situation ethics is a relatively new notion that sits between those extremes.

The situationist has the one law of love (agape), many general rules of wisdom (sophia) which are more or less reliable, and the particular moment of decision (kairos) "in which the responsible self in the situation decides whether the sophia can serve love there or not." According to Joseph Fletcher, who defined this principle, there is no one of the commandments which may not be broken in some situation for love's sake. He says there are four working principles of situationism: pragmatism, relativism, positivism and personalism.

In situation ethics, onIy the end justifies the means, and all ethical acts are meaningless apart from either helping or hurting persons. There are no intrinsically good acts except the act of love. The aim is to bring the greatest good (Iove) to the greatest number of men. And if love and law are in conflict, Fletcher says it is the Christian's obligation to put love over the law.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

I am a Christian and I do not use 'situation ethics' to make moral decisions; in fact I do not know what situation ethics is!

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why Christians use situation ethics to make moral decision and some do not?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is a moral situation?

When there is a choice of behavior involving human values!!It's when you find yourself in a situation and you have to make what is called a moral decision. It maybe using situation ethics (what you think is the most loving thing to do), your conscience (the inner feeling of rightness and wrongness) etc.I took the quiz:B) CHOICE OF BEHAVIOR INVOLVING HUMAN VALUES


What the difference between civics and ethics?

Civics deals with the rights and responsibilities of citizens in a society, focusing on how government functions and how individuals can participate in the community. Ethics, on the other hand, refers to moral principles that guide behavior and decision-making, focusing on what is considered right or wrong in a given situation.


Do you think Christians should only use the teachings of the Church for making moral decisions?

I disagree because to make a moral decision a combination of authorities are needed to make the right decision on moral issues.


What has the author Paul T Jersild written?

Paul T. Jersild has written: 'Moral issues and Christian response' -- subject(s): Addresses, essays, lectures, Church and social problems, Christian ethics 'Invitation to faith' -- subject(s): Apologetics 'Making moral decisions' -- subject(s): Moral and ethical aspects, Decision making, Christian ethics, Lutheran authors, Moral and ethical aspects of Decision making, Social ethics


What is a example of a moral decision?

Choosing to return a lost wallet with money inside to its rightful owner instead of keeping it for oneself is an example of a moral decision. It involves making a choice that aligns with ethical principles such as honesty and integrity.


How ones moral values affect one's sense of ethics?

Explain how one's moral values affect one's sense of ethics


What is the fundamental difference between utilitarianism and an ethics of virtue?

Utilitarianism is consequentialism. According to utilitarians, the only thing that makes an act morally right or wrong is whether or not it has beneficial consequences. An ethics of virtue is based on the idea (common to many ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle) that a morally right act is some situation that calls for a moral decision is what a virtuous person would do in that situation. .


Why are Christians against bullying?

There are many different reasons why Christians are against bullying. Some of these are: Jesus stopped Peter from attacking the Judas when the Romans came to arrest Jesus from the Garden of Gethsemane shortly after the Last Supper. Jesus condemned Peters violence which shows he is against violence. Bullying always involved violence and so can never be right. It does not follow the Golden Rule. The Golden Rule is: Do unto others and you would have them do unto you. Nobody would want to be bullied, so why would you bully someone else? It does not follow situation ethics. Situation ethics means doing what you think is the most loving thing to do. All Christians try to use situation ethics in moral decision making. Bullying denies basic human rights like "You have to right to be free from harassment and discrimination." Christians believe strongly in human rights and so cannot allow bullying.


What has the author Patricia Hogue Werhane written?

Patricia Hogue Werhane has written: 'Moral imagination and management decision-making' -- subject(s): Decision-making, Management, Moral and ethical aspects, Moral and ethical aspects of Decision-making, Moral and ethical aspects of Management 'Philosophical Issues in Human Rights' 'Persons, rights, and corporations' -- subject(s): Business ethics, Employee rights


Moral demand of ethics of care?

moral demand


What do christians use to make a moral decision?

Being a Christian myself, any good Christian will use the Holy Bible to answer a morally demanding decision and not what the world would answer it with.


A word for moral laws with six digits?

ethics ethics