Among other reasons, they didn't have printing presses!
In addition their economy was based on actual values of precious metals, whereas notes are promises of value based on the faith of the citizens in their government. Not that the Romans lacked faith in their leaders, but they just didn't have any experience with that attitude towards money.
Were the Romans from Greece? No, they were from Rome, which is a city of Italy. Hence, Romans rather than Greeks.
For a time, salt was the currency of the Roman Empire. The army was paid in blocks of salt. Our word salary comes from that time in history. Eventually, coins were minted because it was easier for a Roman to carry a pouch of coins rather than 100 pounds of salt, when going shopping.
It was opportunity rather than necessity. Trade is stimulated by opportunities to produce and sell good. The expansion of Roman trade was linked to the expansion of the Roman Empire, which created a large common trading unit with the Romans coins providing a common currency and the Romans building infrastructure to facilitate trade.
Boudicca reveived no punishment from the Romans. It is said she poisoned herself rather than face the consequences.
define liquidation preferences as disclosures should be made in the equity section of the balance sheet, rather than in the notes to the financial statements
No, the Romans were not great sewers. They used sewing, but they preferred to pin, belt and drape rather than sew.
That would be the trombone, as it changes notes by use of a slide rather than valves.
While bills are cheaper to print than coins, coins have a much longer lifespan than bills. It made sense economically to eliminate the $1 and $2 notes.
It depends on what coins notes and other money that you have in that 75 pounds, if u hav 100000 10c coins it would be less amount than 100000 50c coins, but about the same weight.
arpeggio
Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.Yes. Recently many Roman finds, ranging from coins to buildings and forts have been unearthed in Wales. These archaeological finds prove that the Romans penetrated deeper into Wales than was previously thought.
Other than the introduction of the $2 coin and the withdrawal of the 1 and 2 cent coins, Australian coins have not changed much since 1986. The Queen has aged a little. The paper Bank notes of the past have been replaced with colourful polymer notes.