Want this question answered?
ecological succession
There are no reasonable scientific alternatives to cell evolution, especially since the endosymbiotic theory is now widely accepted. I an sure you can think of some unreasonable alternative to cell evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Cells could be though as organisms is unicellular especially.
Actually Darwin's theories and evidence were almost immediately accepted by the scientific community. His dissertations met with great success and very little resistance. Most of those who did resist had theological underpinnings for their belief that species were immutable and could not change over time. And it was for that same reason (ie. religion) that Darwin's discoveries were not accepted by the general public and that the teaching of biological evolution, though a demonstrable and extraordinarily well understood fact of nature, meets with resistance even to this day.
Evolution is change. There are a lot of changes science has brought to the world and one big thing is technology. Scientific evolution pertains to the growing understanding people nowadays know about how our environment works and how to use them.
Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Change over time.
To ensure that change will be accepted in the community you should consult widely.
ecological succession
There are no reasonable scientific alternatives to cell evolution, especially since the endosymbiotic theory is now widely accepted. I an sure you can think of some unreasonable alternative to cell evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Cells could be though as organisms in unicellular especially.
There are no reasonable scientific alternatives to cell evolution, especially since the endosymbiotic theory is now widely accepted. I an sure you can think of some unreasonable alternative to cell evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Cells could be though as organisms is unicellular especially.
evolution
There are no reasonable scientific alternatives to cell evolution, especially since the endosymbiotic theory is now widely accepted. I an sure you can think of some unreasonable alternative to cell evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Cells could be though as organisms is unicellular especially.
A gradual change in life-forms over time is organic evolution.
adaptation or evolution are the two most common.
The scientific theory is evolution.
it is evolution
Actually Darwin's theories and evidence were almost immediately accepted by the scientific community. His dissertations met with great success and very little resistance. Most of those who did resist had theological underpinnings for their belief that species were immutable and could not change over time. And it was for that same reason (ie. religion) that Darwin's discoveries were not accepted by the general public and that the teaching of biological evolution, though a demonstrable and extraordinarily well understood fact of nature, meets with resistance even to this day.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.