According to the Kalvin - Plank statement:-
It is impossible to construct a device operating in a thermodynamic cycle. which produce no effect other than work output and exchange heat with a single reservoir
and if it will be possible then it will called the PMM-2 (Perpetual motion machine of second kind).
because if the engine exchange heat only with one thermal reservoir then the entire heat is converted into an equivelnt account of work and efficiency become 100%.
A absorb heat
That's because they convert the energy to heat first. Do some reading about the Carnot cycle, or the theoretical Carnot engine; briefly, if (for example) the environmental temperature is 300K (27 degrees Celsius), and the heat engine operates at 900K (627 degrees Celsius), then the maximum theoretical efficiency is (900 - 300) / 900, or about 67%. The efficiency achieved in real machines, of course, will be less than that.
input
please rephrase ur question so that it can be understood
It is always less than 100% Theoretical machines can have efficiencies of 100% but in practice there is always some energy loss Efficiencies of more than 100% are not allowed by the laws of thermodynamics!
The mass affects the efficiency of an object. It adds more weight, which causes more friction. More friction=less efficiency
No. No engine can be 100% efficient. The Carnot cycle is mathematically proven to provide an upper bound for efficiency. The efficiency of the Carnot cycle can be calculated from the formula:eta = 1 - Tc/THwhereis eta is efficiencyTc is the temperature of the heat sinkTH is the temperature of the heat source.The only way to make the (theoretical) efficiency 100% would be to have a heat sink at absolute zero (which is impossible due to the 2nd law of thermodynamics) or to have the heat source at a temperature of infinity (which is impossible due to the 1st law). Real engines always operate at an efficiency less than the theoretical because they operate on a less efficient cycle and/or posses real irreversibility in their operation. Consequently no engine - real or theoretical - can operate at 100% efficiency.
why is the efficiency of a calorimeter less than 100%
conventional jet engines (using a compressor) will operate at speeds up to slightly less than Mach 1using an afterburner a conventional jet engine can operate at speeds slightly above Mach 3ramjet engines will operate at speeds up to about Mach 5scramjet engines can operate at speeds well above Mach 6However the maximum speed of of an actual airplane is usually less than the capability of the engines it uses.
Because there is always going to be friction, the efficiency of any machine will always be less then 100 percent.
Most small engines are two stroke because you can get more power from a smaller engine with two stroke rather than a four stroke engine. It takes less to cool and to operate the engine.
It can be up to 40 percent in modern plants, less in old ones
diesel. Diesel engines tend to have better efficiency especially at less than full load. Gasoline/Petrol and LPG engines tend to have better power weight ratios.
Efficiency as a percent is output/input * 100%12000/15000 * 100% = 80% efficiency which makes sense, because it takes more work (input) than it give out (output). So the efficiency should be less than 100%.
Reasons of efficiency. not the least of which is that the pressure generated in the combustion chamber has to fight less "back pressure" (think of it as pressure resistance) at high altitude because the air-pressure is less.
That simply means that some energy is lost, due to friction and other causes.
That's because they convert the energy to heat first. Do some reading about the Carnot cycle, or the theoretical Carnot engine; briefly, if (for example) the environmental temperature is 300K (27 degrees Celsius), and the heat engine operates at 900K (627 degrees Celsius), then the maximum theoretical efficiency is (900 - 300) / 900, or about 67%. The efficiency achieved in real machines, of course, will be less than that.
1. Jaw plates are reversible. 2. Broken particle size uniformity, crushing ratio of high efficiency. 3. Less noise, dust, easy to operate. 4. Well-designed, easy to operate.