Is VT meant to be an acronym for Voltage Transformer?
If so, then the answer may be that any transformer which has been designed to run at a very high voltage, such as 33 kilovolts (33,000 volts), must obviously be built using insulation for its wiring that is already well-tested - and therefore known -not to break down at its designed working voltage.
The insulation will already have been tested - under safe laboratory conditions - to be certain it will withstand many times the transformer's designed working voltage. The test voltage could be as high as 330 kilovolts or more.
So there is no point in rigging-up a further, very expensive, extra-high-voltage test facility to test such a 33kV transformer specifically for insulation quality in the the factory or manufacturing plant where such Transformers are built.
When the transformer has been built it is normally sufficient to ensure that it doesn't overheat when working at its rated power under a prolonged soak test - probably for as long as a week or more - before it is shipped to its final installation site.
At the final installation site, in common with allnewly-installed high-voltage substation equipment, voltage transformers (known as 'potential transformers' in North America) are tested after installation, and before commissioning, using a hi-voltage ('Hi-Pot') test set.
1848 -- 3 vts ==> Taylor/Fillmore (W)1852 -- 3 vts ==> Pierce/King (D)1856 -- 3 vts ==> Buchanan/Breckinridge (D)1860 -- 3 vts ==> Breckinridge/Lane (D)1868 -- 3 vts ==> Grant/Colfax (R)1872 -- 4 vts ==> Grant/Wilson (R)1876 -- 4 vts ==> Rutherford/Wheeler (R)1880 -- 4 vts ==> Hancock/English (D)1884 -- 4 vts ==> Cleveland/Hendricks (D)1888 -- 4 vts ==> Cleveland/Thurman (D)1892 -- 4 vts ==> Cleveland/Stevenson (D)1896 -- 4 vts ==> Bryan/Sewall (D)1900 -- 4 vts ==> Bryan/Stevenson (D)1904 -- 5 vts ==> Parker/Davis (D)1908 -- 5 vts ==> Bryan/Kern (D)1912 -- 6 vts ==> Wilson/Marshall (D)1916 -- 6 vts ==> Wilson/Marshall (D)1920 -- 6 vts ==> Cox/Roosevelt (D)1924 -- 6 vts ==> Davis/Bryan (D)1928 -- 6 vts ==> Hoover/Curtis (R)1932 -- 7 vts ==> Roosevelt/Garner (D)1936 -- 7 vts ==> Roosevelt/Garner (D)1940 -- 7 vts ==> Roosevelt/Wallace (D)1944 -- 8 vts ==> Roosevelt/Truman (D)1948 -- 8 vts ==> Truman/Barkley (D)1952 -- 10 vts ==> Eisenhower/Nixon (R)1956 -- 10 vts ==> Eisenhower/Nixon (R)1960 -- 10 vts ==> Nixon/Lodge (R)1964 -- 14 vts ==> Johnson/Humphrey (D)1968 -- 14 vts ==> Nixon/Agnew (R)1972 -- 17 vts ==> Nixon/Agnew (R)1976 -- 17 vts ==> Carter/Mondale (D)1980 -- 17 vts ==> Reagan/Bush (R)1984 -- 21 vts ==> Reagan/Bush (R)1988 -- 21 vts ==> Bush/Quayle (R)1992 -- 25 vts ==> Bush/Quayle (R)1996 -- 25 vts ==> Clinton/Gore (D)2000 -- 25 vts ==> Bush/Cheney (R)2004 -- 27 vts ==> Bush/Cheney (R)2008 -- 27 vts ==> Obama/Biden (D)2012 -- 29 vts ==> Obama/Biden (D)
vts is a 16 16v. vtr is 16 8v. so vts is faster
a stock c2 vts can hit 125mph
The VTS is your trim, it adjusts the nozzle up and down for riding.
VTR/VTS rear axle £140 plus £45 delivery
of course it will, vice versa just like a saxo VTS/VTR engine will fit in a forte or desire
106
Its connected to the hose.
Many informative and useful reviews for a Citroen C2 VTS from actual owners can be found at autocar, parkers, whatcar, evo, carsguide, theaa, and autotrader.
put a vtr or vts engine in it
yes it can.
I recieved a letter from vts that states I won money here is my check number 6016225861 and 9120418 on the bottom of the check how do I see if its for real