Want this question answered?
A cell wall is more useful for an organelle.
I don't know! I am looking for it too~!
NO, a golgi apparatus can not be seen under a light microscope, it is one of the hardest organelles to see. It is not the size, but rather its lack of staining in contrast to the surrounding cell. Electron microscopes; however, pick up rather nice pictures of it. Both Scanning and Transmission can; however a transmission electron microscope (TEM) is particularly useful in viewing the multi-layers of this pancake looking organelle. jh/hs sciences jwilliams@freedom.k12.ok.us
Yes, because the methylene blue stain makes the organelles in eucharyotic cells visible to us in a basic microscope.
It would be more accurate to say that it is useful to master the parts of the microscope and their function, rather than necessary. Lots of people manage to live happy and successful lives without using microscopes. However, microscopes do allow us to see things that would otherwise be too small to see, and by seeing those things, we get a better understanding not only of the world of nature, but of our own bodies, which is essential to the modern practice of medicine. So, microscopes matter. Whether you personally want to use one is up to you.
sucking dick and watching pron hub
suck a dick and let the dick sperm on ur face and thats the characteristics
Microscopes are useful so you can see cells.
The microscope that is more useful to estimate red blood cells is an electron microscope because it can magnify to see cells that other microscopes can't see such as the light microscope
Chemical stains make light microscopes more useful by showing specific structures in a cell.
Chemical stains make light microscopes more useful by showing specific structures in a cell.
Microscopes help to see small objects that cannot be seen by the naked eye.
You can use a low power microscope for looking at large insects. Most low power microscopes are called "Stereo" or "Dissecting" microscopes and have two eyepieces and a separate objective lens for each eyepiece lens.
A light microscope would be limited in its ability to see archaea due to their small size compared to bacteria. To effectively study archaea, electron microscopes or molecular techniques like PCR would be more useful.
A compound light microscope is able to provide more clarity and detail than a single lens microscope, which is its advantage. Compound refers to the microscope having more than one lens.
Lysosome
no because using a microscope if you saw the sun you will be blind