Want this question answered?
Many would indeed agree that the president is fairly compensated. He makes approximately $400,000 annually for serving the country and adhering to his presidential duties.
The party out of power has lost the last election and often the last two. Consequently,the past candidates and the old guard in the party have been discredited to some extent at least The party needs to do something different in order to regain power and one obvious way to do this is to find a fresh, new, outstanding candidate who will energize the party and lead it to victory. Ambitious people step forward, attract followers and funding and the primary battles ensue. The party in power can ruin on its record and can establish a more or less order of succession for its next candidate- i.e. either run the incumbent President or if he is in his second term. run the vice-president or someone in his cabinet.
If you could trace their ancestry back far enough you could probably find common ancestors for any pair of presidents, so in a way, they are no doubt all related. However, in the usual sense, people are said to be related only if the relationship is known and fairly close, so in this sense, US presidents are not all related. Some, of course, have been closely related to each other.
This statement is true. Deficit spending is the spending of more than the government takes in.Ê This is a fairly common practice.
Roger Williams
The conventions are not as important as they used to be. However, they still attract a fairly large TV audience and get considerable publicity. A candidate who makes a good showing can improve his chance of election. His acceptance speech is especially important, as is his choice of running mate.
Fairly common yes
Many would indeed agree that the president is fairly compensated. He makes approximately $400,000 annually for serving the country and adhering to his presidential duties.
The party out of power has lost the last election and often the last two. Consequently,the past candidates and the old guard in the party have been discredited to some extent at least The party needs to do something different in order to regain power and one obvious way to do this is to find a fresh, new, outstanding candidate who will energize the party and lead it to victory. Ambitious people step forward, attract followers and funding and the primary battles ensue. The party in power can ruin on its record and can establish a more or less order of succession for its next candidate- i.e. either run the incumbent President or if he is in his second term. run the vice-president or someone in his cabinet.
No, they are still fairly common.
No. They are fairly common where I am.
fairly stable. It's a republic that has elections that run fairly smoothly https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/pa.html
Yes, I think so -- perhaps more than fair. The media tends to favor Democrats, I think . Obama has taken advantage of the Democratic majority in the Senate to issue several presidential directives which are contrary to law. He knows that if he were impeached, the Senate would not convict him.
no.still fairly common.
Yes it's fairly common
Obsidian is a fairly common and has little collector value. The only Obsidian that has a bit more value is Rainbow Obsidian. Which is still fairly common.
It's becoming fairly common.