0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Letters rely on which gives historians useful historical information?
Different types of letters rely on different types of historians and therefore gives very useful historical information. They give various types of information based on different historians.
What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
How do historians investigate history?
Present day historians investigate the histories already written by: * checking the resources used by historians who have written about a particular subject; * by investigating any sources that were overlooked; and * searching primary, secondary leads that may bring to light new sources of historical information.
Why is the parchment of rome a primaresource?
Primary sources are direct historical sources, as opposed to what had been written by modern historians, which are secondary sources. Writing on parchment became widespread in the Later Roman Empire. Hence writings of parchment are primary sources.
Why is useful for historians to base certain studies on the analysis of historical themes?
the same themes apply to different people living in different places and times.
Are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources why?
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.
Letters rely on which gives historians useful historical information?
Different types of letters rely on different types of historians and therefore gives very useful historical information. They give various types of information based on different historians.
What are techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Do historians analyze historical sources in various ways?
Yes Twitter=@MalisVals ;]
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
What advantage do primary sources have over sources for historians?
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
What are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
What advantage do secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing historical sources?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Why do historians use historical thinking skills?
To develop a deeper understanding of the past by using sources
What describes and advantages for secondary sources have over primary sources historians?
They can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted. (APEX)
What are the sources of historical knowledge and explain each?
In general, the sources of historical knowledge can be separated into three categories: what is written, what is said, and what is physically preserved, and historians often consult all three. Wikipedia
