Want this question answered?
A more geological stable place to live would be in the interior of a plate because mountain building, volcanoes, and earthquakes are much more common at plate boundaries than inside the plates.
Well, search up on google how many earthquakes there have been in California and you'll see your answer
By stable temperate climate conditions.
The city located further inland can be significantly drier, the city along the coast can have more stable temperatures. Coastal regions tend to be more stable.
Craton refers to the stable interior portion of a continent. It is composed of ancient crystalline basement rock, containing both shields and platforms.
No
It describes the ongoing changes to the surfaces of terrestrial worlds. This is because terrestrial surfaces change over time. The moon and mercury are considered geologically dead because their surfaces have remained the same for billions of years.
State of California
A more geological stable place to live would be in the interior of a plate because mountain building, volcanoes, and earthquakes are much more common at plate boundaries than inside the plates.
The relatively stable interior portion of a continent is a craton.
The most geological safe place is in South Africa
The relatively stable interior portion of a continent is a craton.
Cratons, large geologically stable areas in continental interiors.
It isn't. The best records come from long term geologically stable areas
Well, search up on google how many earthquakes there have been in California and you'll see your answer
Assuming you mean the Pacific one, the "Ring of Fire" is a string of underwater trenches and volcanoes, hence the name. An estimated 90% of all earthquakes occur along it. While the area can be dormant for some periods of time, the entire area is "geologically unstable" in comparison to the rest of the world.
Yes.