Want this question answered?
File a motion with the court. They will examine the motion and make a ruling.
Laws & ruling.
make a new law
Laws & ruling.
Any trial court, federal or state, has the power to make a ruling like this. The rulings are always subject to appeal up through to the state or Federal Supreme Court. Even a state court ruling on the issue may be taken to the US Supreme Court.
Justiciability is used to refer to a matter which is suitable for a trial court to hear. That is, if a matter is justiciable, then a trial court has the authority to hear the matter and make a ruling.
Depending on the context, it is usually a verdict, a ruling, or a holding.
An administrator or personal representative is appointed when there is no will.Yes, you can object is you are an interested party to the estate but you must be prepared to explain your objection to the court. The court will hear the objection and make a ruling. Unless you have a very good reason the appointment will be allowed.An administrator or personal representative is appointed when there is no will.Yes, you can object is you are an interested party to the estate but you must be prepared to explain your objection to the court. The court will hear the objection and make a ruling. Unless you have a very good reason the appointment will be allowed.An administrator or personal representative is appointed when there is no will.Yes, you can object is you are an interested party to the estate but you must be prepared to explain your objection to the court. The court will hear the objection and make a ruling. Unless you have a very good reason the appointment will be allowed.An administrator or personal representative is appointed when there is no will.Yes, you can object is you are an interested party to the estate but you must be prepared to explain your objection to the court. The court will hear the objection and make a ruling. Unless you have a very good reason the appointment will be allowed.
In part, she tries to run her TV show the way a real court would operate; testimony must be direct and in response to questions. This is far more strict (and realistic) than some other court shows on television, which permit litigants to tell long stories containing lots of irrelevant, unprovable details, slander and doubletalk. Second, she uses intimidation as a tactic to get litigants to perjure themselves. Once she catches them in their own lies, she can make a ruling without having to dig into a lot of details. Finally, she really has little patience for fools, and none at all for crooks. In many cases, she has a pretty good idea of what the litigants were trying to do, by reading their complaints and police reports, before hearing their testimony. She has seen just about everything in her career and she understands human motivation, so she can tell if one or both of the litigants got into their situation by trying to do something illegal or underhanded. She will usually question individuals like that aggressively from the outset.
A conservative member of the supreme court is likely to make a ruling against immigration,against abortion rights and against tightening gun laws.
You need a lawyer and a court ruling. Not opinions from strangers.
The president has certain measures that he can take to make the court's decisions less effective, but in general, the president does not have authority over the federal courts and is bound, like the average citizen, to their rulings.