Depends what you mean by 'more real'? Primary data will be conducted for the exact means of your study so is likely to have a greater degree of validity than any secondary data you might use. Chances are it will also be more up to date too. Data gathered years previously is less likely to provide reliable answers to the questions you data needs to answer
Secondary research looks into the target audience and issue. This may include desk research and stakeholder consultation.
Primary research is carried out directly with the target audience. For example:
Primary sources are not more reliable than secondary sources. For example, eye witness accounts are filtered through the witness's perceptions.
because its more realiable.. you actually see it happening therefore its more visual and accurate
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
secondary
Why would an organic chemist prefer to read primary sources about experiments In her field rather than secondary sources
Primary Sources are created by people who actually experienced the event.
streak
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
Yes, the Hypatia biography had more primary sources than the Joyner biography. Hypatia's biography was based on first-hand accounts and historical documents from her time, while the Joyner biography relied more on secondary sources and interpretation of events.
secondary
Go for the 1.9 much more realiable than a 2.5 in t5 guise.
I needed Primary Sources for Walt Disney as well... Also theres a website called justdisney.com where you can get recordings, miniclips, quotes, bibliographies, and much more. If I were you I would go and check it out!
It would be a primary sourcebecause it is word for word as it was written. In a similar more obscure way, letters written by Adams to Jefferson are primary sources.