0
Depends what you mean by 'more real'? Primary data will be conducted for the exact means of your study so is likely to have a greater degree of validity than any secondary data you might use. Chances are it will also be more up to date too. Data gathered years previously is less likely to provide reliable answers to the questions you data needs to answer
What else can I help you with?
Why is better primary data?
because its more realiable.. you actually see it happening therefore its more visual and accurate
Do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians and why?
Primary sources are more valuable to modern historians because they are more reliable.
Are primary sources or secondary sources more valuable to modern historians?
secondary
Why would an organic chemist prefer to read primary sources about experiments in her field rather than secondary sources?
Why would an organic chemist prefer to read primary sources about experiments In her field rather than secondary sources
Which property is more realiable in mineral Identification Color or streak?
streak
What advantages do primary sources have over secondary sources?
Primary sources provide firsthand accounts or direct evidence of events, while secondary sources interpret or analyze information provided by primary sources. Primary sources are often more reliable and can provide unique perspectives that may not be found in secondary sources. They can offer a deeper understanding of historical events or issues.
What is one advantage of using primary sources when doing research on an experiment?
Primary Sources are created by people who actually experienced the event.
Is secondary sources are easier to find than primary sources to evaluated integrity?
Secondary sources are generally easier to find than primary sources because they summarize or analyze information from primary sources. However, in terms of evaluating integrity, primary sources are generally considered more reliable as they provide firsthand information without interpretation or bias that may be present in secondary sources.
Why can a secondary source more helpful than a primary source?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
When is a secondary source more helpful that a primary source?
A secondary source is more helpful when you are looking for analysis, interpretation, or synthesis of information already presented in primary sources. It can provide additional context, perspective, or critical assessment of the primary sources.
Why would it be wrong to think that primary sources are more reliable than secondary sources?
While primary sources are valuable for firsthand accounts, they can still be biased or incomplete. Secondary sources provide analysis and interpretation of primary sources, offering a broader perspective. It's essential to consider multiple sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of a topic.
Did the hypatia biography have more primary sources than the Joyner biography?
Yes, the Hypatia biography had more primary sources than the Joyner biography. Hypatia's biography was based on first-hand accounts and historical documents from her time, while the Joyner biography relied more on secondary sources and interpretation of events.
