Repeated trials of the same measurement will show validity, IF the measurement is a valid measurement. For example, most psychological tests administered by professionals have been validated. But, if a person tried to make up questions similar to the MMPI test, the made up questions would only be an unscientific poll and would not be a reliable instrument.
Repeated trials of the same measurement are desirable to increase the reliability and accuracy of the results. By taking multiple measurements, any variations or errors can be identified and mitigated, leading to more robust and trustworthy data. Additionally, repeating the measurement helps to reduce the impact of random fluctuations and outliers, providing a clearer picture of the true value being measured.
Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure in producing the same results in repeated trials. In psychology, reliability is important as it ensures that the conclusions drawn from the measurements are stable and not influenced by random factors.
This statement uses the Transfer technique by associating the positive ideas and feelings of Jane Golf with the product Spritz. It implies that by using Spritz, you can also achieve the same desirable qualities as Jane Golf.
A neutral stimulus is a stimulus that initially does not elicit a specific response. In classical conditioning, the neutral stimulus becomes associated with a meaningful stimulus through repeated pairing, eventually causing the neutral stimulus to elicit the same response as the meaningful stimulus.
Sampling with replacement is used when it is desirable for each item in the population to have an equal chance of being selected each time, and when it is acceptable for the same item to be selected multiple times in the sample. This method is commonly used in bootstrap resampling and in situations where the population is large and well-mixed.
The question suggests that negative punishment is the same as withdrawing positive reinforcement. This is not exactly true. A "desirable consequence" is what behaviorists call an appetitive stimulus: one that, when made contingent on a target behavior, serves to increase the likelihood of that behavior happening again. That is the main idea behind positive reinforcement. Negative punishment, on the other hand, is meant to decrease the likelihood of the target behavior. It is called "negative" because it is withdrawing an appetitive stimulus which is pre-existing. In other words, the withdrawal of the stimulus is contingent on the target behavior; negative punishment is not a withdrawal of the contingency itself.
The requirements are that there are repeated trials of the same experiment, that each trial is independent and that the probability of success remains the same.
If you repeat the experiment and you get different results, then the accuracy of your first trial is not correct.
the quality or state of being reliable2: the extent to which an experiment, test, or measuring procedure yields the same results on repeated trials
No. However repeated measurements can be averaged or otherwise be used to arrive at a more accurate result.
The word "reliability" can be defined as dependability. It can also be defined as having the quality of being reliable or dependable. Another definition is something that produces the same result in repeated experiments or trials.
the same :)
Exponents can be used to simplify notation when the same factor is repeated
Multiplying is the same as repeated addition.
Repeated trials can be used to ensure the precision of your results. For example, let's say you are measuring a substance with a scale. You can measure the same amount multiple times to ensure your scale is working properly, and to verify the level of precision the scale is using.Repeated trials can also be used to control for variables. For example, if you are performing a chemical reaction, you could repeat the experiment with varying levels of humidity in the air to see the effect it has on the reaction.Repeated trials by multiple scientists can be used to verify the accuracy of the data reported by another scientist. When a scientist publishes the results of an experiment, other scientists can attempt to reproduce the experiment to verify its legitimacy.
its the same event no difference
The Nuremberg Trials were important because they held key Nazi officials accountable for their roles in the Holocaust and World War II. The trials established the precedent that individuals could be held responsible for committing atrocities under international law, paving the way for future prosecutions of war crimes. Additionally, the trials helped bring a sense of justice and closure to the victims and survivors of the Holocaust.
The same