TO find support for their hypotheses
[object Object]
hfngfnxgfxngfxnnbxgfngfnf
scientists say it is possibly a sense
We'll respond to this question when you improve your grammar and think of a question that makes sense.
That means that there it doesn't make sense to specify an "absolute motion" - motion is always specified relative to some object (sometimes movement relative to the Earth is implied, not stated). There is no physical experiment that can tell the "true speed" of an object, so scientists conclude that there is no such thing as a "true speed".
Even as a young child, Albert was fascinated by the physics of the world around him. He was able to combine this sense of wonder with an excellent ability to understand the science and math behind our Universe. Like many scientists, he simply never reached the point where his sense of wonder at our Universe exceeded his ability to study it.
In a sense the answer to your question is "yes." What quantum mechanics actually tells us is that at the fundamental level objects of very small mass sometimes behave as particles and sometimes behave as waves. Trying to determine whether they're "really" one or the other is like trying to distinguish between six and half a dozen.
Not yet. Pranav Mistry is still trying to improve the prototype. But, when it does come, it is likely to cost as much as an iphone.
scientists say it is possibly a sense
By avoid from smocking someone can improve his six senses.
false
a bird i think
Good oral hygiene and no smoking.
Good oral hygiene and no smoking.
This question doesn't make any sense.
It is not always better.Although quadratic equations always have solutions in the complex system, complex solutions might not always make any sense. In such circumstances, sticking to the real number system makes more sense that trying to evaluate an impossible solution in the complex field.
The question doesn't make much sense. The Earth is always"lined up" with the Sun, in the sense that you can always draw a line through two points.The question doesn't make much sense. The Earth is always"lined up" with the Sun, in the sense that you can always draw a line through two points.The question doesn't make much sense. The Earth is always"lined up" with the Sun, in the sense that you can always draw a line through two points.The question doesn't make much sense. The Earth is always"lined up" with the Sun, in the sense that you can always draw a line through two points.
If you were trying to make sense, sorry, you failed.
Nobody in Congress is trying to actually impeach Obama in the formal sense of trying to remove him from office. If you mean "impeach" in the sense of trying to make him look bad, this is what parties and politicians do . As for fear of the next election, an incumbent President always has an advantage and the power base that elected Obama the first time seems to still support him. Reports are that Obama has already raised a formidable amount of campaign money. It is always hard to get anyone who feels they have a serious chance to be elected president to run against an incumbent.