Unlike earlier rockets which used capsules to transport crew, space shuttle orbiters, their engines and solid rocket boosters are reusable. Only the external fuel tank is discarded during space shuttle missions
i dont nowe
Rockets and their motors improve all the time.
Rockets work better in space than in air. In space, rockets don't have to overcome the resistance caused by air, allowing them to achieve higher speeds and more efficient propulsion. In contrast, in the Earth's atmosphere, rockets have to fight against air resistance which hinders their performance.
No.
It is much better for a child to go to bed earlier.
Because if they keep making them it will just cost more money. They are actually very old technology. The money they are spending on the shuttles could be spent on a better way to get anyone into space.
Solid fuel rocket boosters, as used in the first stage when launching the space shuttles, are very powerful but cannot be easily controlled. Once they have ignited, they wont stop until the fuel has burned up. They generally give more power than liquid fuel rockets though.
Not really. While the Spurs have 4 Championships they have never won back-to-back championships as did the Rockets and in direct competition the Rockets have the advantage in Playoff series, having a 10-6 record against the Spurs in post-season play.So, no, the Spurs are not the better team.
Qassam rockets are like mortar rockets. Its not for firing at tanks. You are mixing it up with Anti-tank rockets which can be fired like bazooka. Also, to use a Qassam Rocket as an anti-tank missile would require it to be "aimable". Qassam Rockets cannot be aimed much better than the cardinal directions.
Hell no. The Lakers have Kobe, the best player in the nba.
Tulips should be planted in Fall twice as deep as the bulb its self.
Streamlining - the cylindrical shape 'slices' through the air better than one with sharp edges.