Because the common names aren't very descriptive.
The reason is because common names are not very descriptive and also that common names do not provide information about the chemical composition of the compound. Common names can vary between countries and between different areas of science.
A systematic name describes the chemical structure of a substance/compound and also gives some info. on its chemical properties. Common names are basically how they sound, a generally common name that is often coined with a part of the systematic name. For example, acetone would be the common name used and the systematic would be Propan-2-one.
Common names are non-systematic names given to chemical compounds based on historical or traditional use, while IUPAC names are systematic names assigned according to a set of rules by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) to ensure clarity and consistency in chemical nomenclature. IUPAC names are preferred in scientific and technical communication due to their unambiguous nature.
The latin term for "Nitric Acid (HNO3)" is aqua fortis , which means brave water.
No, a compound can have multiple names that are associated with the same chemical formula. The name of a compound may vary based on the naming system used, such as common names or systematic IUPAC names.
Systematic name is a name given in a systematic way to one unique group, organism, object or chemical substance, out of a specific population or collection.Systematic names are usually part of a nomenclature.
Thorium carbide is a systematic unique name in chemistry.
Caffeine is actually the common name and the systematic name is 1,3,7-trimethylxanthine
This a rational name established by IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry).
Cituse auretifolea Cituse auretifolea
Aston Merrygold has not given preferred girl names.
The systematic name for IF3 is iodine trifluoride.