Observations from Earth-based telescopes are obscured by the atmosphere.
He spoted the rings of Saturn and made observations upon planet movements along with the phases of the moon and surface of the moon
That the earth revolves around the sun and the moon revolves around earth
It's true that there is no atmosphere on the moon, so studying the stars with a telescope would in some ways be better as there would no atmospheric effects that you would get from earth based telescopes. It's debatable whether it would be better overall though as it would be rather impractical to put such a lab on the moon.
No, they cannot. Only a little over 50% of the moon's surface can be observed from earth, and observations must be made over a period of about 15 years in order to observe the maximum amount of surface.
Galileo Galilei constructed telescopes to conduct his observations. He also disproved the Ptolemaic model.
He spoted the rings of Saturn and made observations upon planet movements along with the phases of the moon and surface of the moon
That the earth revolves around the sun and the moon revolves around earth
It's true that there is no atmosphere on the moon, so studying the stars with a telescope would in some ways be better as there would no atmospheric effects that you would get from earth based telescopes. It's debatable whether it would be better overall though as it would be rather impractical to put such a lab on the moon.
No, they cannot. Only a little over 50% of the moon's surface can be observed from earth, and observations must be made over a period of about 15 years in order to observe the maximum amount of surface.
Galileo Galilei constructed telescopes to conduct his observations. He also disproved the Ptolemaic model.
One of the main reasons why there is a push to construct a base on the moon is because telescopic observations from the moon would be clearer due to the fact that there would be no interference from an atmosphere, as is experienced on the Earth.AnswerMoon AnswerThe heavy mirror in a large telescope becomes distorted in a gravitational field when fixed on the earth, which would happen even on the moon with its reduced gravity. This reduces the quality of the image. Actuators placed under the mirror are used to minimise this effect in some large modern telescopes (called active optics, see reference). However, orbiting the earth in space the telescope mirror becomes weightless and these effects can be virtually eliminated. This simplifies the telescope design and the subsequent image quality should be improved.An orbiting telescope would also be cheaper to launch and service than one located on the Moon.
Earth's moon would have been the first moon discovered. Galileo observations identified four of Jupiter's moons - Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto - in 1610.
you look in the sky or use telescopes
the moon because its closer to earth
No, it would not. Telescopes located on mountaintops ... above most of the atmosphere ... work much better than telescopes located in valleys do. And, viewed from the moon, where there's no atmosphere at all, the stars are plainly visible in the sky even when the sun is too.
The sun travelling around the earth, the moon doing the same and the stars seemed to do the same as well!!
Jupiter's moons orbited it and thus did not have a the earth as their axis of rotation.