They are usually at the bottom, because most of them are easy to kill or hunt down
ANSWER:I THINK FROGS
If an animal has no predators then it is at the top of the food chain. Such an animal is called an apex predator.
The elephant is not a carnivore and has very few natural predators. So, no, not all non-carnivores are at the bottom of the food chain.
Animals are usually at the top of a food chain. This is because they are consumers. Producers (plants) are at the bottom of the food chain. The producers are consumed by the primary consumers (herbivores) who are then consumed by the secondary consumers ( carnivores ).
Cows are at the bottom of the food-chain, since they are herbivores, not carnivores. In contrast, humans would be at the top.
Yes, herbivores are an important part of a food chain. They consume producers (plants) and are then consumed by carnivores and omnivores, forming a crucial link in the transfer of energy and nutrients through ecosystems.
Herbivores are at the bottom of the food chain, if they did not exist carnivores would have nothing to eat and they would cease to exist, as would everyone else above them on the food chain
On a food chain, it depends which direction it is going-up or down or across-but on an energy pyramid, it is at the bottom(widest part) because it has most energy.
In the ocean, plankton is at the bottom of the food chain. On land, tiny invertebrates .
Carnivores in the food chain would eat cows. This is because carnivores eat meat and cows have meat in them.
carnivores,omnivores and herbivores
The bottom of the food chain is the plant or the producer.
humans