Want this question answered?
No. Herbivores always outnumber the carnivores in an ecosystem.
I think there are supposed to be an equal amount as well as plants the herbivores eat. This is to maintain an equilibrium so no side makes the other extinct. I think this holds true to the point of an outside factor. Weather killing a large amount of plants could affect an ecosystem by having a lack of food for the herbivores. They may die off leaving little to no food for the carnivores. I think it's all about equilibrium so there should not be more carnivores than herbivores and vice versa.
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
No. Here's the thing, no energy conversion is never 100% efficient. Meaning if a creature eats one pound of meat, it can't grow one pound of body from that. If they're all carnivores, eating each other, the system would never even get going. It would run out of energy. It's like driving to a gas station over and over again, and always buy less fuel than it took you to get there. Pretty soon you'll run out. Any system that isn't 100% needs to be constantly topped up with energy. With plant eaters, it's sunlight that does this.
Yes, Sharks, Dolphins, and several other carnivores live underwater
No. Herbivores always outnumber the carnivores in an ecosystem.
There are fewer top carnivores than herbivores in a land ecosystem, primarily because they are more resources available to herbivores than carnivores. For example, there are many plants available for herbivores to eat, and carnivores have a limited choice of herbivores, depending on the environment. Think of it this way: If there were more carnivores than herbivores, then eventually, there will be a very little amount of herbivores left for carnivores to eat, and those carnivores will either have to adapt, migrate, or starve. 90 percent of energy is lost when one organism consumes another. This means that a carnivore gets 90 percent less energy from eating a herbivore than the herbivore gets from eating a plant. So, in order for a carnivore to get as much energy as a herbivore, it must eat more herbivores. So, if it were the other way around, the carnivores would not have enough food to eat.
I think there are supposed to be an equal amount as well as plants the herbivores eat. This is to maintain an equilibrium so no side makes the other extinct. I think this holds true to the point of an outside factor. Weather killing a large amount of plants could affect an ecosystem by having a lack of food for the herbivores. They may die off leaving little to no food for the carnivores. I think it's all about equilibrium so there should not be more carnivores than herbivores and vice versa.
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
I think there is a pretty even amount of carnivores and herbivores. There might be a bit more herbivores because they need more of their species to survive, since the carnivores hunt them.
no. There were more herbivores than carnivores and u think all dinosaurs are carnivores! =(
Carnivore means only one meat eater,and carnivores are more than one meat eaters.
They help the ecosystem and contribute to it and they help they ecosystem.
An arctic ecosystem will be more fragile than a southern forest ecosystem because, it has much less biodiversity and there is a substancial difference in the amount of plants and animals that make up the ecosystem. Hope this helped everyone...
No. Here's the thing, no energy conversion is never 100% efficient. Meaning if a creature eats one pound of meat, it can't grow one pound of body from that. If they're all carnivores, eating each other, the system would never even get going. It would run out of energy. It's like driving to a gas station over and over again, and always buy less fuel than it took you to get there. Pretty soon you'll run out. Any system that isn't 100% needs to be constantly topped up with energy. With plant eaters, it's sunlight that does this.
there will be no ecosystem
More individuals, less energy, more producers, or fewer carnivores?ANSWER: more individuals because there are more types of omnivores and carnivores(who feed off of primary consumers) than there are herbivores (who feed off of primary producers)