answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

To ensure that the accused get the right to a far trail and to use the American legal system to administer justice. As you have seen in the Amanda Knox case people deserve the right to a fair trail. In this case the trail was biased by newspapers and what not and since the jury was not sequestered the trail was biased.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Very important.

No matter how good an attorney is, the decision after arguments falls to the jury. It is important to keep a diverse jury that won't be biased by ethnicity, gender, or age.

For example: suppose a young Hispanic male is accused of stealing goods from a local store, and the owner is an elderly african-american male.

Would the verdict of a predominantly african-american jury be fair to the young Hispanic male? We do not know, but in this case, there may be some bias.

A jury that consists of male and females of different ethnic background, religion, age, etc. may help gear the case towards a fair verdict

Questions are posed to the jurors during selection. Some jurors may have been victims of crimes before, and so, their reasoning towards those accused of committing crimes may be different than someone who has never been victim of a crime.

In short, Jury selection is important because we need people to render a verdict without considering who or what the accused is: only what the accused is being accused of.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

because the jury is the group of people who listen to other peoples problems and decides who is guilty and who is not.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

To make the outcome fair so that no-one knows anyone else in the court

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is the jury important to the legal system?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the french legal system and what was English legal system?

The answer to the " three of the following terms are associated with the development of the english legal system, " "A common law, B petit jury, C grand jury, D exchequer"" The answer is D Exchequer


What are some advantages of the jury system?

The advantages of the jury system are as follows : * The jury system allows the general people of the country to take part in the administration of justice. * The jury service has necome a convention in the UK, which provides confidence to the people about the impartiality and fairness of the jury trials. * Since jurors are lay people who are not legal experts, they decide cases on the basis of fairness. This reduces the harshness of the legal system.


Do chinese people serve in jury?

No, China does not have a jury system. Judicial decisions are mainly made by judges in the Chinese legal system.


Who is a juror?

Jurors are usually members of the public or certain legal luminaries who compose a jury, i.e, a board to decide a trial or a case. They are neither part of the Bar or the Bench, In the USA, they are chosen randomly from the eligible voters' list. UK has a jury system. India does not use the jury system to decide its cases; they are decided by the judges themselves.


What are the three most important reasons for having a jury system?

to get rid of bad guys


What important legal practice dates back to Henry II?

Jury trial, As a means of administering 'Royal Justice'.


In To Kill a Mockingbird how long was the jury out and why is this important?

In To Kill a Mockingbird, the jury deliberates for a significant amount of time, indicating that there is some doubt or conflict among them. This is important because it highlights the racial bias and injustice present in the legal system, as well as the challenges of confronting prejudice in society.


How did the Athenian jury system differ from the US jury system?

The Athenian jury system selected jurors randomly from a pool of volunteers, while the US jury system selects jurors from voter registration or drivers license lists. In Athens, the jury size could be up to 501 citizens, while in the US, a standard jury size is 12. Additionally, in Athens, jurors voted by placing a token in one of two urns, whereas in the US, jurors deliberate and reach a consensus verdict.


What is a jury pool?

A jury pool is a group of people from which a legal system may draw to fill a jury. In most places, a jury pool is made up of citizens of a particular jurisdiction who are considered legal adults. Typically, people who have been convicted of committing serious crimes are excluded from a jurisdiction's jury pool. For example, individuals who have committed felonies are usually restricted from serving on juries. Essentially, a jury pool is a population of people who are eligible to serve on jury.


Why do Americans in prison the wrong person?

Because the American legal system is based on trial by jury. Trial by jury is made up human people. As you may know human people are flawed. Thus, the American legal system is flawed. If you feel as strongly about these flaws as I do, we meet at the Overpass every Wednesday at midnight. Sic Semper Tyrannus.


Where did the trial by jury come from what system do other countries use to decide the facts in the case?

The jury system arose in England hundreds of years ago. If there was a crime in a community, the accused was brought to trial before a judge and a jury. The judge presided over the trial and served as the legal expert. The jury was a group of twelve men who were from the area where the crime was committed. The jury heard the evidence and then they, not the judge, decided whether the accused was guilty or innocent.


Where did trial by jury come from what system do some other countries used to divide the facts in a case?

The jury system arose in England hundreds of years ago. If there was a crime in a community, the accused was brought to trial before a judge and a jury. The judge presided over the trial and served as the legal expert. The jury was a group of twelve men who were from the area where the crime was committed. The jury heard the evidence and then they, not the judge, decided whether the accused was guilty or innocent.