Why are walnut flowers considered incomplete flowers?

Answer 1

1.)Many flowers have all four sets of appendages present --a complete perianth consisting of both sepals (calyx), petals (corolla), and both sets of sexual organs --stamens (androecium) and a pistil (gynoecium). Such a flower is termed "complete." Some species, however, bear "incomplete" flowers.

Some incomplete flowers possess both sets of sexual organs, i.e., they are "perfect." Thus they have a simple perianth consisting of only a caylyx (but no corolla), or the perianth is lacking entirely. (While a few petalous species having early-deciduous sepals come to mind, I can't think of an example of a flower that produces petals but genuinely lacks sepals.)

Here are some examples of "perfect" (hermaphroditic), but incomplete, flowers.

Below, rue-anemone. This is a spring wildflower, easily confused with Isopyrum biternatum(false rue-anemone).

2.)Below, American elm. Like many trees, elms are wind-pollinated. The flowers are protected by winter buds and they burst forth before the leaves, obviating the need for sepals. And being wind-pollinated, "advertising" is unnecessary, hence the flowers are apetalous, too.

3.Below, black walnut. Many wind-pollinated trees are monoecious, i.e. the flowers are unisexual (male or female) but both types are found on a single tree. Commonly, they bear individually small but very numerous male flowers presented on drooping catkins well-suited to send pollen grains aloft into the passing breeze, while the female flowers are larger, produced singly (or at most in pairs or few-flowered clusters). Most members of the oak/beech/chestnut (Fagaceae) and walnut/hickory (Juglandaceae) exemplify this pattern.

4.)Black walnut is monoecious, producing separate male and female flowers on the same individual.

Lacking a need for (sentient) pollinators, these flowers have no colorful perianth parts such as petals. In order to acquire the wind-blown pollen, the stigmas, antenna-like, are expanded like big catcher's mitts.

5.)Below, eastern cottonwood. Dioecious species have wholly separate male and female individuals. Members of the willow/aspen/cottonwood family (Salicaceae) are good examples. Cottonwoods are wind-pollinated and produce their flowers --both types! --in drooping catkins. Note the very expanded stigmatic surface of the pistillate (female) flowers

6.) Below, boxelder maple. Unlike most (all?) of our other maples, which are monoecious, boxelder is strictly dioecious. Both types are produced in drooping clusters, and have long pedicels that increase exposure to the pollen-bringing wind.

7.) Boxelder-maple flowers. Left: staminate (male) catkins. Right: pistillate (female).

As with people and a great many other animals, the expression of plant sexuality isn't always very clear-cut. (Forests are sometimes clear-cut; that's bad.) A plant might mostly produce unisexual flowers. Some species of meadow-rue, for example are "polygamo-dioecious," bearing on one plant flowers partly perfect and partly pistillate, and on another plant flowers that are partly perfect and partly staminate.

Below, tall meadow-rue. This is a predominantly male individual.

8.)Below, flowers of a mainly male tall meadow-rue. Amidst a lot of wholly staminate flowers, there is a solitary young fruit produced on a perfect (hermaphroditic) flower.

9.)Mostly male tall meadow-rue with a perfect flower