Want this question answered?
Humans cut down trees and other plants, taking away the cover aganst the wind for the are. The less cover there is, the more liable the land is to receive wind erosion.
Nobody is liable for an act of nature. Each property owner would responsible for their own insurance to cover resulting damages and debris removal from their own property.
Close Corporation major features:A close corp is a legal entityAudited financial statements are not requiredMeetings are not compulsory and can be held on an ad hoc basisMay become shareholders in other companiesAll members may take part in managementThe proprietor or member is not personally liable for the debtsThe legal procedures for registration and administration of closed corp are kept relatively simple
Active volcanoes are those which are liable to erupt or have shown frequent eruptions within recent history.They are ones that still erupt at (irregular) intervals, often gently emitting gases and steam during their quiescent spells.
Slumping occurs after heavy periods of rain, when the water saturates overlying rock, making it heavy and liable to slide. This happens as a result of heavy rain passing through permeable rock, such as sandstone, and then it continues to move towards impereable rock, such as clay, but the pores are tiny and so the water slides through saturating the rock, resulting in the undercutting of a steep slope, which creates a concaved sliding slope. In addition to this, layers of boulder clay, left behind by melting glaciers - caused by coastal erosion - can become saturated and also cause slumping.
No.
YES!
Companies are always liable for the actions of their agents, unless the agent is acting outside his authority in a way that the company would not have been expected to notice.
Yes, I may be held liable for my actions
... is liable for any damage due to negligible actions...what is negligible actions in this sentence. it's from a product information.
The most liable place for an earthquake is on a major fault line. Japan suffers strong earthquakes yearly. They suffer about 1500 a year.
No.
They bear no presumption of negligence and are only liable for the dollar value of the erroneous payment that is attributable to their actions.
No, at age 19, the "child" is an adult responsible for his own actions. The parent has no legal authority to make the 19 year old do what the parent wishes, therefore the parent cannot be held liable for the child's actions.
yes
No. Individuals are responsible for their own actions.
As long as your daughter is under 18 or 22 in som cases you can be held liable for any of her actions